![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... On Jul 19, 6:55 am, Mike Spera wrote: If these cracks are caught by your mechanic, they won't kill you but they'll kill your bank account. If we have a choice between a "well-maintained" (yeah, right) older high-timer and one that has sat for years, I'll take the sitter as long as it doesn't have corrosion issues (humidity, salt air, or non-human residents). Both airplanes will need new engines and interiors and other plastic and rubber bits replaced. The high-timer will need structural repairs, maybe a lot of them. They're not cheap. By the time you're done you could have far more tied up in the airplane than it would ever be worth in resale value. There may be some dud A&Ps out there, but there's also a lot of great ones that have extensive knowledge of older aircraft. Just because an aircraft is high time doesn't mean it WILL require structural repairs, and even if they do, not all such repairs are expensive as some can be addressed by stop drilling or other solutions. Just because the aircraft is high time, doesn't mean it WILL need a new engine. In fact, it's less likely to need one. An older aircraft that's sat for several years or has never had an overhaul WILL need one as well as a new interior and probably new glass, whereas the high time aircraft stands a good chance of having things like interior and glass replaced at some point and definitely has had the engine reworked or replaced. Everything really boils down to a proper pre-buy from a knowledgeable mechanic which is just as important regardless of how much time the airframe has. At 9,000 hrs, I would definitely consider my airplane high time, but it's still going strong and there's the same type out there still going strong with twice that many hours. Since I fly the thing only about 200 hrs per year, it's going to take 10 years just to get 2,000 more hours assuming I still have it by then. Since I'm confident my aircraft is structurally sound, the chances of it needing a significant structural repair are pretty much the same as a low time aircraft. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
High time Bo A36 anyone? | Matt Whiting | Owning | 9 | February 8th 08 10:45 PM |
High time homebuilts | alice | Home Built | 2 | February 17th 07 07:06 AM |
typical total time and PIC time question | AJW | Piloting | 12 | October 15th 04 03:52 AM |
First Time Buyer - High Time Turbo Arrow | [email protected] | Owning | 21 | July 6th 04 07:30 PM |
152 with high time lycoming | Dave | Owning | 1 | June 27th 04 06:20 AM |