![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed Rasimus wrote in message
It wasn't a readily available option when initially called for. Remember that Afghanistan is a long way from anywhere. At the time of Anaconda, the primary tactical assets were carrier based and flying extremely long duration, multiple refueling sorties. The flexibility for immediate on-call CAS was not available. Ed, I take issue with your last statement, unless you're limiting the scope of your answer to tacair only. My wing flew 300 sorties during Anaconda and dropped 845 JDAM's and 24 Mk84's providing excellent on call air power. Granted we're a heavy bomber and could fly 1000 miles and then loiter for a few hours, which the fighter guys couldn't do. I'm sure BUFDRVR can chime in with the BUFF's contribution to CAS in Afghanistan. It only goes to back up what you've been saying, methods of delivering CAS are changing. Cheers, Michael Kelly, Bone Maintainer |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AIM-54 Phoenix missile | Sujay Vijayendra | Military Aviation | 89 | November 3rd 03 09:47 PM |
P-39's, zeros, etc. | old hoodoo | Military Aviation | 12 | July 23rd 03 05:48 AM |