![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
bdl wrote:
On Aug 4, 10:03 am, "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: For those that fly IFR to AirVenture, how did the service this year compare to prior years? I thought it was great. Flew up Sunday, flew back Wednesday afternoon. I was a little worried about having to file to DLL, as that was further west than I needed to go, but I got a turn south just east of Madison, which was pretty close to the direct path. The airspace in the OSH/FLD/SBM area at and below 13,000' was transferred from Chicago ARTCC to Milwaukee TRACON last February. I wanted to compare user's experiences with the change. MKE certainly had problems with it. The Letter of Agreement between Green Bay and Milwaukee TRACONs during AirVenture had ATW arrivals over FAH at 7000' and GRB arrivals over FAH at 10,000'. Chicago ARTCC ended up leaving them both at 14,000', pointing them out to Minneapolis ARTCC and giving them to GRB to work down. The LoA had all ATW departures that would enter MKE airspace on a 130 heading, all MTW departures on a 220 heading, and all GRB departures and all overflights on a 180 heading between CHING and CLINS. To avoid subjecting users to that form of ATC abuse GRB rerouted most of the departure and overflight traffic around or over MKE approach airspace. ZAU did the same with arrivals. That being said, I didn't have many problems in previous years. One thing I noticed was there seemed to be a lot of pilots requesting VFR advisories and being turned down. More than I had heard on previous years (from my recollection). I know the NOTAM said no VFR advisories within 150 miles or whatever, but was there some sort of rule forbidding a controller from accepting VFR advisories, even on a workload permitting basis? I got the impression (hard to tell from just voice inflection) that several controllers wanted to issue radar advisories, but were being restricted from. If there was anything sort of "rule" like that it was an internal MKE rule. I'm a controller at GRB, I denied advisories to a few aircraft but they were all well within MKE approach airspace and were never going to be in mine. I just told them who they could call and about where they should call once leaving MKE approach airspace. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Joe Honeck at Airventure | Mike Proctor | Piloting | 1 | July 29th 08 10:00 PM |
SSA at EAA AirVenture - can you help? | Dave Newill | Soaring | 0 | June 19th 08 02:44 AM |
EAA AirVenture '05 | noone none | Home Built | 0 | September 6th 05 10:36 PM |
AirVenture 2005 | john smith | Piloting | 1 | July 22nd 05 01:54 AM |
Airventure get-togethers | Morgans | Piloting | 18 | May 21st 04 02:12 PM |