![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 12:33:04 -0800, Lyle wrote:
Ed, What is the difference between direct close airsupport, and close airsupport, or is it just all lumped together and called close air support. Sounds like some sort of semantic argument. I never heard the term "direct close air support" used in any official context. Close Air Support is the employment of tac air assets in direct support of ground units. It would, by its very nature be "direct". With regard to fire support of ground units, there is the distinction between direct and indirect fire. That's the difference between aimed large-bore guns such as tank cannon and parabolic lobbed shells such as artillery and mortar. Maybe someone more current than I am in the latest nomenclature can contribute to the discussion. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AIM-54 Phoenix missile | Sujay Vijayendra | Military Aviation | 89 | November 3rd 03 09:47 PM |
P-39's, zeros, etc. | old hoodoo | Military Aviation | 12 | July 23rd 03 05:48 AM |