![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Clark wrote:
I'm not an Aussie but the F-111 is still in service. More to the point is fact that the F-111 was replaced in US service by something better while the Russians cannot seem to replace the Su-24 even though much better aircraft are available. According to a Jane's report I read almost a year ago, the Aussie F-111s, while officially in service until 2010, are no longer in operation. They even held an official "retirement" party. They might have started flying them again - I don't know. The Su-27IB is, no doubt, a more capable aircraft than the Su-24. However, the difference in capabilities is not that striking, in my opinion. With a few upgrades, the Su-24 can still match the best Western types in the same class. -- Venik ------------------------------- http://venik4.livejournal.com/ http://www.aeronautics.ru/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flanker vs F-15 | Boomer | Military Aviation | 67 | April 18th 04 05:47 AM |
[New WebSite] Su-27 Flanker | Benoit | Military Aviation | 0 | November 11th 03 04:54 PM |
[New WebSite] Su-27 Flanker | Benoit | Rotorcraft | 0 | November 11th 03 04:53 PM |
[New WebSite] Su-27 Flanker | Benoit | Naval Aviation | 0 | November 11th 03 04:53 PM |
Flanker 2.5 | Dan Rowntree | Simulators | 1 | September 2nd 03 07:33 PM |