![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alan Minyard wrote in message . ..
On 12 Dec 2003 12:51:59 -0800, (Tony Williams) wrote: Chad Irby wrote in message . com... In article , (Tony Williams) wrote: We know the Mauser works, too - it's been in service in large numbers for two decades. The initial assessments by the JSF team concluded that the Mauser was the most cost-effective choice, and they knew all about the GAU-12/U then. Part of that "cost effectiveness" appeared to be a lowball pricing structure that fell through on closer examination. Do you have a source to support that? You may be right, but I like to work on hard info rather than forum gossip. Tony Williams Military gun and ammunition website: http://www.quarry.nildram.co.uk Discussion forum at: http://forums.delphiforums.com/autogun/messages/ The Mouser was to be a completely new system, using linkless ammunition. It has never been demonstrated, much less placed in service. The linkless feed was developed years ago and is used in the Eurofighter Typhoon installation, so is just about to enter service. So what have we determined? 1. The German Mauser BK 27 was selected by both Boeing and Lockheed-Martin over the GAU-12/U as the best and most cost-effective gun for the JSF (documented fact). 2. The cost of the gun rose well over budget (documented fact) probably because Mauser's US partners spent far too much on adapting it to US use (reasonable assumption). 3. GD, in their position of gun armament integrator, took advantage of the situation to slip in a lower bid for the GAU-12/U, which was accepted by L-M (clear conclusion from press statement). So to sum up, the F-35 will be getting the second-best gun because Mauser's US partners couldn't keep their costs down. Incidentally, you seem to equate preferring a non-US gun with an 'anti-American bias'. You should have words with the US armed forces. The US Army's standard 5.56mm MG is the (Belgian) FN Minimi, its standard 7.62mm GPMG is the (Belgian) FN MAG, and its standard 9mm pistol is the (Italian) Beretta. The M16 rifle family is expected to be replaced soon by the XM8, based on the (German) Heckler & Koch G36. The advanced XM29 5.56+20mm weapon is also having its hardware developed by HK. The M1A2 Abrams tank is armed with a (German) 120mm gun, replacing the (British) 105mm in the M1A1. The USN has made extensive use of the (Italian) 76mm OTO, and the US Coastguard has selected the (Swedish) 57mm Bofors as the main gun for its new class of ships. The USMC has selected the (British) RO 155mm as its next howitzer. Of course, the USMC also operates the AV-8B aircraft, based on the (British) BAe Harrier, and the USN uses the T-45 Goshawk trainer, a version of the (British) BAe Hawk. Evidently these services are riven with anti-American bias. Or perhaps they're just sensible enough to buy the best weapons available from the western world? Tony Williams Military gun and ammunition website: http://www.quarry.nildram.co.uk Discussion forum at: http://forums.delphiforums.com/autogun/messages/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AIM-54 Phoenix missile | Sujay Vijayendra | Military Aviation | 89 | November 3rd 03 09:47 PM |
P-39's, zeros, etc. | old hoodoo | Military Aviation | 12 | July 23rd 03 05:48 AM |