![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Morgans wrote:
"Dudley Henriques" wrote Wise up. These constant threads about the problem ARE the problem!!!!!! That view has been plainly and obnoxiously stated by you, but just because that is your opinion does not make it right. I thought of being as disrespectful to you, as you have been to me, and others with my view. I won't. I will not lower myself to the level you have. All I will say is that I hope you enjoy the conversations with Anthony, when he starts to question your views and advice, as he surely will. I guess you deserve each other. I had not planned to address you at all again, but you had to let loose a couple GFY posts, that I thought you said you were not going to do towards me, but you were going to ignore me. I ask for only the same thing as what you wish. If you expect me to not address you or my views, please extent the same courtesy to me. I doubt you can resist, though. The last word is yours. Look Morgans, I'll try this another way. Perhaps you'll finally get the picture. You got the reaction you did from me last night only after you posted another one of your famous lectures on who should do this and that, and who should be allowed to post with whom. Finally I had had it with you, and the result is what we have now. Just to prove to you how utterly stupid what you are doing has become, let me present only one single case; that one involving you and me. Both of us are pilots. Both of us have come to this forum to deal with aviation issues and aviation issues alone. Now, let's bring Anthony into the picture and see what has happened. Your "plan" and incessant posting against this person has reached what in my opinion anyway, is a level close to an obsession. You tell people how to act on the forum. You "advise" people on what they should be doing and saying on the forum. In short, you spend an inordinate amount of your time here obsessing about a few individuals you have deemed unworthy of belonging here. The problem with all this is that Usenet is a free and open forum. Everybody is welcome here as long as the posting is on topic and respectful. Now nobody says Anthony is respectful, but he does seem to be on topic when he posts. If he isn't, he should be ignored, but that isn't good enough for you. YOU have decided that Anthony must go. Well I'm here to tell you that Anthony most likely isn't going anywhere. For whatever reason he has, he likes it here, and as I said, this is Usenet, and if he stays, it's up to the forum to deal with it. Now you and I have opposing opinions on how to deal with these issues. That's not the problem here. The problem is that YOU seem to feel that you can lecture me and others as well on our Usenet behavior. You will note that the ONLY time I have engaged you with my opinions on this issue is after being engaged by you telling me how I should be dealing with Anthony. I've told you that the answer is quite simple, but the premise that Usenet is a free and open forum MUST be accepted as that can not be changed by either you or myself. This means that Anthony has the same right to be here as you or I do. Get that through your head once and for all. As for your "lecturing" on how to deal with Anthony, here are the results. As of last night, a pilot with whom you have been exchanging meaningful aviation related dialog with for many years has reached the stage with your "handling" of the Anthony issue (Off topic as it is) that this pilot has washed his hands of you permanently and won't ever again be exchanging aviation dialog with you. YOU on the other side of the equation, have come to the same conclusion about this pilot. Result of your "plan" and it's repercussions; two pilots who will never talk with each other again because they can't stand each other, and you guessed it.......Anthony is STILL here. So your intervention has cost you and it's cost me, but it's cost Anthony nothing! Good job there Morg...REAL good job!! Wonderful plan you have going on the forum :-) As for me, if Anthony or anyone else wants to ask an on topic aviation related question or make a respectful comment on aviation, I will handle that post with the respect it deserves. If I'm nailed with off topic bull crap like lectures on how to handle this person or that person, that poster will be the likely recipient of a "GFY" reply. To be quite frank, I come here to discuss aviation as do many others. I don't demand that I like those with whom I discuss aviation and I sure as hell don't give a damn if they like me in return. Usenet isn't a personality contest. and I SURE won't be lectured to by anyone who's criteria for my "acceptance to the group" is that I agree with what I'm being lectured about. Just something for you to think about. How many MORE pilots do you want to **** off in your quest to rid the forum of those you dislike? Anyway, have a nice day and take care. -- Dudley Henriques |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AUDIO: Bush jewish. Blair jewish. Howard jewish. Sarkozy jewish. 1.2 million muslims dead. Thousands of Americans dead. Trillion$ missing. | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 0 | November 2nd 07 05:56 PM |
Dead DG | mbremer216 | Owning | 27 | February 26th 06 10:51 PM |
Is the F-35 dead? | nemo | Military Aviation | 13 | December 31st 03 11:07 AM |
Is Rafale dead? | Charles Talleyrand | Naval Aviation | 33 | December 16th 03 11:17 PM |
Chinook down, 13 dead | John Mullen | Military Aviation | 0 | November 2nd 03 11:02 AM |