![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ŽiŠardo wrote in
: Clem wrote: "Glen in Orlando" wrote in news:48afebf6$0$28433 : Hey Clem... the most effective method, as compared to your three posts.. is right here.... Resized to a whopping 135kb... Quck, easy, and guess what.. a good old fashioned JPEG.... I can view anything posted here...yENC, Mime, etc..etc.. but WHAT IS THE POINT? Glen in Orlando. begin 666 E-14209LARGE (Large).jpg Attachment decoded: E-14209LARGE (Large).jpg ` end I agree you can take a file and resize it. If all you have are a few files it's worthy way to do it. Some people post 20-30 or more files from an airshow. They can spend a full evening just to resize each picture. There are some nice shows around here. I would love to take pictures and share them, but I need to reduce the overhead. I'm not going to reduce each one seperately unless it's only a few shots. I collect nose and tail art that's usually taken in high quality. If you take a high quality picture that's been reduced, you can enlarge it again with little loss to the quality of it. The question is, which method of reduction leads to the least amount of quality loss. Posting a side by side comparison of different transfer techniques seemed like a logical way to compare them. I would also like to know how everyone is receiving the files off their servers. I'm still having problems just seeing all the standards pictures posted. I see replies regarding them, but I fail to see some of the original posts and I'm tired of doing a parent search half the time. Don't worry, I'm not uploading anymore files that size. If anyone could recommend software that reduces a batch of files at one time, I would appreciate hearing about it. Try this: http://www.gpsoft.com.au/ OK, it comes at a cost, but the "Tools" "Convert Images" facility is superb - once you work out what to do. I understand that Irfanview, free of charge, has a similar facility. This makes two I never heard of before. 30 day evaluation is a nice selling point. I think the price is $65. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mojave Civilian Flight test center accident...Rutan SpaceShip II propellant test explosion. | Blueskies | Piloting | 3 | July 27th 07 11:47 PM |
Test Firing of the Saturn V S-II S (Second Stage) at the Mississippi Test Facility 6759495.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 12th 07 01:46 AM |
F-1 Engine Test Firing at the S-IB Static Test Stand 9808563.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 9th 07 01:39 PM |
POSA Carb Info and HAPI Engine Info | Bill | Home Built | 0 | March 8th 04 08:23 PM |
Starting new info site need info from the pros | MRQB | Piloting | 7 | January 5th 04 03:20 AM |