![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bob Noel" wrote in message
... In article YNfsk.641$w51.45@trnddc01, "Mike" wrote: "Bob Noel" wrote in message ... In article LSesk.685$lf2.108@trnddc07, "Mike" wrote: There was no perjury. He lied under oath. That, by definition, is perjury. No it's not. 'The offense of willfulling telling an untruth in a court after having taken an oath or affirmation." You still don't have it right after two tries. The false testimony has to be material to the case. A person can lie under oath all day long on questions immaterial to the case and never be convicted of perjury, yet this fits both definitions you provided. Again, it's obvious you have no clue about the subject you attempt to argue. However your definition does demonstrate why you don't posses the knowledge to argue such points. Isn't my defintion. It's the incorrect one you provided. That makes it yours. Either you didn't know it was incorrect, or you knew it was incorrect and provided it anyway for reasons one can only guess. Take your pick. Clinton was never convicted or even so much as indicted for any such crime, or any other crime for that matter. which does not mean he didn't lie. It means he's innocent of perjury. Presumed innocent by the legal system. Exactly. And anything contrary is a poorly based opinion. The Independent Counsel investigation spent $100 million and the better part of a decade trying to convict Clinton of anything and came back with nothing. Mr. Honeck's suggestion that Clinton got off because of his position is ridiculous to the point of hysteretics. In fact he was federally investigated more than any human being in the history of the United States. So you might want to start asking yourself how someone who was subject to so much scrutiny able to escape without so much as indictment for a charge you're so certain he committed. If you're not familiar with the facts of the situation, you should better educate yourself before you comment. indeed. Glad you agree. If only others would educate themselves... You still haven't gotten so much as the definition of perjury correct after two tries. You might want to look at yourself first, but that's just a suggestion. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Obama/Marx | Orval Fairbairn[_2_] | Piloting | 115 | June 30th 08 06:08 PM |
LOVE POEMS, POETRY & QUOTES | [email protected] | Piloting | 0 | May 7th 07 01:11 PM |
Quotes please... | Casey Wilson | Piloting | 38 | May 24th 06 02:51 AM |
Favourite quotes about flying | David Starer | Soaring | 26 | May 16th 06 05:58 AM |