![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:44:51 -0400, Dudley Henriques wrote:
I would have no problem with medicals requiring a shorter active period based on a proactive projection of accident stats vs health issues within a specific age bracket graduated after say a beginning point of 40. In other words, the older you get and/or when you enter into an age bracket where stats put you at a higher risk factor, the period of your medical shortens accordingly. This makes sense especially if the quality of the medical is increased accordingly. The rub in all this, even in my own projection, is that it assumes that sooner or later a pilot will reach a "no further medicals allowed" point where a mandatory retirement is indicated. Disagree. If you can pass a sophisticated and comprehensive medical, there should be no approach points. Pass = fly regardless of age. Considering present regulations, the engine to implement such a plan would be extremely difficult to design and push through the required legislation. Can't argue with this, don't have the expertise. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|