![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In rec.aviation.piloting Mxsmanic wrote:
"Lonnie" @_#~#@.^net writes: 5) FAA minimums on Ox usage are conservative enough to acomodate even heavy smokers. Perhaps they are conservative enough to keep smokers from dying, but not conservative enough to shield smokers from the effects of altitude. Heavy smokers can hardly increase in altitude at all without suffering the effects of altitude, beginning with vision impairment, usually. Funny, I'm a heavy smoker by anyone's definition, live at 1300 feet, and at 8500 feet there is no effect on my vision. Once at 7500 feet at night things got a little blurry and I became concerned it might be oxygen effects, so I dropped down lower and nothing changed even after I landed, so I chalked it up to being tired that late at night. Maybe your black and white, one size fits all, blanket statements just aren't true for everyone. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|