![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18 Okt., 07:56, Jack wrote:
First the problems with the DG-300 spars, and now the DG-505 paperwork. In both cases DG apparently feel that they are absolved of any responsibility to their customers--and have little concern for future sales, apparently. Fine airplanes, as a rule: damn poor attitude, though. Have DG never heard of customer support after the sale? There must be people here in the US who would be willing to help US owners of both types sort through these problems with minimal cost and frustration, if DG would be willing to do their part to coordinate. Expecting customers to ship a glider back to Europe at the owner's expense to solve factory production or government paperwork problems, is not a foundation on which to build trust. Perhaps they should remember that designing good aircraft is only one part of the business. The FAA have their own problems, of course. How nice it would be if DG could show it is on a higher plane. Jack Hi Jack Sorry to say, but nearly everything in your posting is wrong. Let me explain: 1. The glider was built and sold by and paid to AMS. DG had just no shares in that business. I only had allowed AMS to use our molds - that's all! 2. As described below the customer was aware of the problems and ordered one of our inspector to the US. We prepared everything, but then he cancelled the journey. 3. We did not write any invoice to the (non-)customer. We did the preperation as service. That is our policy. 4. Obviously the problems were caused by the FAA - that is completely outside of our control. 5. The customer is aware that inspite of sending the glider to Germany for an inspection we also can repeat the visit we had prepared some years ago. We need to inspect the glider personally - then we are allowed to issue the necessary paperwork. Although we did not sell the glider, it is self-evident for us to offer our help, wherever it is needed. 6. Jack, you definetely will know it already: DG also had no shares in the business of the DG-300's with the spar problem. These gliders were neither built nor sold by DG Flugzeugbau. It is very simple to inform yourself and you should do it, before you are writing such a nonsense! Best Greetings Friedel Weber DG-Flugzeugbau GmbH Soaring - Touch the Sky! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Airworthiness Certificate Replacement? | [email protected] | Soaring | 6 | June 26th 08 07:11 PM |
TBO and airworthiness | Jim Stewart | Owning | 26 | April 17th 07 05:05 PM |
USA Glider Experimental Airworthiness Certificate | charlie foxtrot | Soaring | 4 | April 15th 06 05:04 AM |
Exhibition/Racing Airworthiness Certificate Question | bsquared | Soaring | 5 | June 22nd 04 06:24 PM |
Airworthiness Directives for Jantar Standard 3 | Miguel Lavalle | Soaring | 5 | January 24th 04 10:55 AM |