asymetric warfare

ess (phil hunt) wrote:

:On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 09:12:47 GMT, Thomas J. Paladino Jr. wrote:
:
:LOL.... now you're talking about *multiple* lauch & storage facilities,
:
:Launch facility = a land rover and trailer

Ok, so now you're trying to coordinate a thousand vehicles.

:storage facility = any building will do

Where they will eventually be found, since you need a big enough door
to get your land rover and trailer through

:for
:potentially 500-1000+ missiles, all cooridinated with each other to hit the
:same small targets *simultaneously*?
:
:co-ordination = radio

In which case we're going to KNOW when you're spooling up to shoot and
you'll be dead before everybody gets rolled out and ready.

:The infrastructure and technology for
:that undertaking would be even more cost prohibitive, but just as futile.
:Even if they were somehow built and tested (extraordinarily unlikely);
:again, what would stop *all* of these facilities from being taken out in the
:first 10 seconds of the war?
:
:Knowing where they are?

You'd be surprised.

id the USA knock out all Iraqu tanks at the start of the 2003 or
:1991 wars? No, it did not, unlike in your worthless comtemptable
:idiot strawman scenario. Did the USA knock out all Serbian tanks in
:the Kosovo war? they didn't in the whole war, let alone the first
:ten minutes.
:
:Face it, this is a bad idea.
:
:Face it, you're an idiot bull****ter.

Now THERE is a telling response. Ok, after that magnificent
exposition of technological prowess, I'm sure we're all convinced now
that your magical $10k cruise missile is perfectly workable and we're
ready to admit defeat.

Don't let the door hit you on the ass on your way out....

--
"Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute."
-- Charles Pinckney