![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Canuck" wrote in message
... "Andrew Chaplin" wrote in message ... "Canuck" wrote in message ... "Andrew Chaplin" wrote in message They MAY encourage recruitment for the military. That is debatable. What is not debatable that they are a symbol for the military and for Canada in general. Canada and Canadians need this. What is so hard to understand about that? How does it relate to force effectiveness? Anything that does not contribute to the mission of the Forces of protect the interests of the Canadian state, and I can find no way that the Snowbirds contribute to the mission, is non-essential. Any non-essential activity that costs money should be cut. In whose opinion??? The Snowbirds are not non-essential. I repeat: they are a symbol of Canada and act as good will ambassadors for our country. They enhance Canadian unity. How is this non-essential? Because they are part of the Canadian Forces, and the symbolism and goodwill has no direct connection, nor can one quantify a contribution, to the generation of forces that can, either through action or their existence, "defend Canada and Canadian interests and values while contributing to international peace and security," the role of the CF laid down in the plans at http://www.cds.forces.gc.ca/pubs/strategic_e.asp. The notion that the Snowbirds "enhance Canadian unity" is highly debatable, if not downright preposterous. The aircraft are pretty and their pilots are talented, but the money thrown at them could fund hundreds of billets for people in the arms and technical trades, and those are what we need in the field. The Snowbirds fall on the circus side of the "bread and circuses" balance sheet. I am reminded of the sign on the Armaments Section of 434 "Bluenose" Squadron, my battery's neighbours in Chatham: "Pilots do it better but without armament it wouldn't be of any military significance." So.... the Blue Angels, Thunderbirds, Red Arrows, ad infinitum should just pack it in? Yes, unless the case can be made for their contribution to the mission of the service that fields them. -- Andrew Chaplin SIT MIHI GLADIUS SICUT SANCTO MARTINO (If you're going to e-mail me, you'll have to get "yourfinger." out.) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2008 Hawk Display Aircraft - 6588-W.jpg (1/1) | RustYŠ | Aviation Photos | 0 | October 30th 08 08:13 PM |
2008 Hawk Display Aircraft - 6586-W.jpg (1/1) | RustYŠ | Aviation Photos | 0 | October 30th 08 08:13 PM |
2008 Hawk Display Aircraft - 6586-W.jpg (0/1) | RustYŠ | Aviation Photos | 0 | October 30th 08 08:13 PM |
McChord - SAGE Display F4C & Radar Antenna Feb 2008 [3/7] F4C_2.JPG (2/2) 226 K | Mr Bill[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | February 19th 08 12:52 AM |
McChord - SAGE Display F4C & Radar Antenna Feb 2008 [1/7] F4C_F16_1.JPG (1/1) 179 K | Mr Bill[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | February 19th 08 12:51 AM |