A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Thrust line: a no-thought experiment.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6  
Old November 16th 08, 01:11 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,130
Default Thrust line: a no-thought experiment.

On Nov 14, 6:00*pm, Alan Baker wrote:

I can't help noticing you've somehow missed the cutsie reply when I
provided an actual reference that shows that your entire notion is
bull****...

http://www.av8n.com/how/htm/4forces.html


Interesting that the above article does not address thrust acting
through centre of mass. Not once. Thrust opposes drag, and acts on
mass only during acceleration or deceleration. The thrust line does
not *have* to be aligned anywhere near the CG.
Too much of this discussion has ignored the stabilizer. There's a
thing called decalage, which is the difference in angles of incidence
between the wing and the stab/elevator. The stab is usually angled
down a degree or two relative to the wing's chord line and has the
effect of stabilizing the rotational couple imparted by the CG being
ahead of the CP. This downward alignment also has the necessary effect
of lifting the nose when power is applied so that the nose will fall
into a glide all by itself if the power fails or is reduced. This
aspect of the airplane is mandated by design standards, and is the
reason lifting tails were abandoned early in WWI.
(In lifting-tail airplanes a power reduction would lead to a pitch-
up and stall, and usually an unrecoverable spin. And it still happens
once n a while when some dude overloads his airplane with all that
beer in the back, CG way aft of the limit, and has to hold the yoke
forward to keep the nose from pitching up. Death often follows,
especially on approach when power is low and the tail can't be lifted
anymore.)
So thrust lines that aren't or can't be aligned near the CG are
not a big deal. The stab incidence is adjusted so that the desired
pitching occurs. Just look at the Lake amphibians, with their very
high thrust lines; The decalage is quite pronounced, and even at that
there's some odd behavior when the throttle is opened. But it still
glides like it should when the power's taken off.
http://www.seaplanes.org/graphics/members/la4200.jpg
Note that the thrust is pointed right at the stab to help control
pitching; it's not pointed through the CG at all. THAT would be
impossible.
See the decalage he http://mars.ark.com/~dcf/takeoff2.jpg
And he http://www.seabee.info/images/teal/N6595K-03-640.jpg

Now look at the decalage on various "ordinary" airplanes that have
their props on the nose, and see that there's very little compared to
those amphibians.

Decalage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decalage

Dan
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
effect of changed thrust line. [email protected] Home Built 103 November 24th 08 09:30 AM
ATM Experiment Canister 0101322.jpg [email protected] Aviation Photos 0 April 8th 07 01:14 PM
thrust line for engine and not mounting engine on this thrust line tommyann Home Built 8 December 15th 06 03:31 PM
A small experiment Mike Borgelt Soaring 16 May 6th 05 06:41 AM
High thrust line on canard design? Shin Gou Home Built 4 March 5th 05 03:06 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.