![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 14, 6:00*pm, Alan Baker wrote:
I can't help noticing you've somehow missed the cutsie reply when I provided an actual reference that shows that your entire notion is bull****... http://www.av8n.com/how/htm/4forces.html Interesting that the above article does not address thrust acting through centre of mass. Not once. Thrust opposes drag, and acts on mass only during acceleration or deceleration. The thrust line does not *have* to be aligned anywhere near the CG. Too much of this discussion has ignored the stabilizer. There's a thing called decalage, which is the difference in angles of incidence between the wing and the stab/elevator. The stab is usually angled down a degree or two relative to the wing's chord line and has the effect of stabilizing the rotational couple imparted by the CG being ahead of the CP. This downward alignment also has the necessary effect of lifting the nose when power is applied so that the nose will fall into a glide all by itself if the power fails or is reduced. This aspect of the airplane is mandated by design standards, and is the reason lifting tails were abandoned early in WWI. (In lifting-tail airplanes a power reduction would lead to a pitch- up and stall, and usually an unrecoverable spin. And it still happens once n a while when some dude overloads his airplane with all that beer in the back, CG way aft of the limit, and has to hold the yoke forward to keep the nose from pitching up. Death often follows, especially on approach when power is low and the tail can't be lifted anymore.) So thrust lines that aren't or can't be aligned near the CG are not a big deal. The stab incidence is adjusted so that the desired pitching occurs. Just look at the Lake amphibians, with their very high thrust lines; The decalage is quite pronounced, and even at that there's some odd behavior when the throttle is opened. But it still glides like it should when the power's taken off. http://www.seaplanes.org/graphics/members/la4200.jpg Note that the thrust is pointed right at the stab to help control pitching; it's not pointed through the CG at all. THAT would be impossible. See the decalage he http://mars.ark.com/~dcf/takeoff2.jpg And he http://www.seabee.info/images/teal/N6595K-03-640.jpg Now look at the decalage on various "ordinary" airplanes that have their props on the nose, and see that there's very little compared to those amphibians. Decalage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decalage Dan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
effect of changed thrust line. | [email protected] | Home Built | 103 | November 24th 08 09:30 AM |
ATM Experiment Canister 0101322.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 8th 07 01:14 PM |
thrust line for engine and not mounting engine on this thrust line | tommyann | Home Built | 8 | December 15th 06 03:31 PM |
A small experiment | Mike Borgelt | Soaring | 16 | May 6th 05 06:41 AM |
High thrust line on canard design? | Shin Gou | Home Built | 4 | March 5th 05 03:06 AM |