![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
keep in mind Jet engines move a LOT of air....a LOT of air and only a very
small amount of the air being moved is actually used in combustion so what you have is a lot of air....and a small % of (fire) combustion... tim wrote in message ... On Dec 7, 8:41 am, wrote: I guess that the heat problem on the tail will clearly appear with the new engine (twice the thrust of the actual one) Not necessarily. I'd guess most of the additional static thrust comes from the fan, rather than a bigger core. This would be likely since the absolute fuel consumption supposedly is unchanged, which means the amount of heat energy produced in combustion is more or less unchanged. With the bigger fan (does the original engine even have a fan, or is it a straight turbojet?) you might actually get lower temps due to the mixing of cooler bypass air after the turbine section. In any event I'm guessing the Hph engineers are aware of what the temperature parameters are as a melty-tail sailplane would not likely pass certification. It would be fun to watch though... 9B |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Old Silentflight videos now on Youtube | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | December 31st 07 11:18 PM |
HpH 304S news | Tim Mara | Soaring | 2 | July 15th 07 04:43 PM |
youtube gliding videos | Mal[_3_] | Soaring | 3 | March 17th 07 04:55 AM |
Hey Tim! HpH 304S | Mike | Soaring | 5 | October 1st 06 03:46 PM |
NEW HpH 304S HORNET II | Tim Mara | Soaring | 3 | April 29th 04 02:41 AM |