|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
December 24th 03, 09:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Greg Hennessy wrote in message . ..
On 23 Dec 2003 11:30:54 -0800, wrote: With humblest respect for your past service to our country, I must admit that the question you pose illustrates the main problem behind why the Bomb was used: Because no one knew a "better" way. This represents a militarily trained, "any-means-necessary" bias. No, this represents "You havent a f*cking clue what you are talking about" attempt at a cop out. Simply re-asserting the bias does not advance your argument. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Hiroshima justified? (was Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other magnificent technological achievements) | Linda Terrell | Military Aviation | 37 | January 7th 04 03:51 PM |
| Hiroshima justified? (was Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other | B2431 | Military Aviation | 7 | December 29th 03 08:00 AM |
| Hiroshima justified? (was Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and othermagnificent technological achievements) | mrraveltay | Military Aviation | 7 | December 23rd 03 02:01 AM |
| Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other magnificent | B2431 | Military Aviation | 1 | December 20th 03 02:19 PM |
| Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other magnificent technological | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 19 | December 20th 03 03:47 AM |
Threaded Mode