![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 22:43:18 GMT, "Dudley Henriques"
wrote: "Ed Rasimus" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 18:23:28 GMT, Mike Marron wrote: "Dudley Henriques" wrote: I don't have a clue what DH is alluding to. Basically, what I'm "alluding to" is that although there's no problem at all discussing security clearances in the generic sense as you have done here; if you personally have a security clearance, or even HAD a security clearance, discussing that clearance, and anything associated with it's relationship to you personally is bad juju! In fact, I would even go so far as to say with all due respect, that although the generic information you gave is fine, I would not have included the fact that you personally had a clearance, even though the fact can be assumed. A quick call to any local FBI office will I'm sure confirm this for you if you have any question about it. Dudley Henriques Well, although you may have good reason for what you say, in my experience, both in the military and in industry, there was never any problem in the statement that one possessed a security clearance. In fact, in industry, your company ID badge displayed stars to quickly identify the level of your clearance. Two stars = secret, three stars = TS. And, your access to specific compartmentalized programs (i.e. "black") was displayed with a letter and number code in an "egg crate" at the bottom of your badge. It was easy to determine if someone had access to a program by looking at your badge and theirs--same numbers and in a cleared location, OK to discuss if they reasonably had "need to know". The FBI had nothing to do with security clearances for active duty military and AFAIK, nothing to do with industrial access which was handled by an NSA sub-office called "DISCO". Seriously, there's nothing magic about security clearances. The security issue is not who has one, but what is accessible after the fact. There is little to be gained in status by possession of a clearance and nothing to be added by ascribing some sort of "bad juju" to the system. Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" Smithsonian Institution Press ISBN #1-58834-103-8 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Bush Pilots Fly-In. South Africa. | Bush Air | Home Built | 0 | May 25th 04 06:18 AM |
Joint German-Israeli airforce excersie (Israeli airforce beats German pilots) | Quant | Military Aviation | 8 | September 25th 03 05:41 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Israeli Air Force to lose Middle East Air Superiority Capability to the Saudis in the near future | Jack White | Military Aviation | 71 | September 21st 03 02:58 PM |