Pentagon "plane" crash revised

nt (Krztalizer) wrote in message ...

Do us all a favour Michael and scuttle off to
alt.conspiracy, they go for this stuff over there.

There is no point. I prefer to be here, Keith.
Although I fully understand your feelings.
If there were no 757 crashed in Penatgon
while US goverment says there was and Ben-Laden
says there was... then what? Then US government
and ben-laden play for the same team. Right?
So I fully understand you...

Michael

This would be humorous if it wasn't such a pathetic attempt for attention. We
show you photos of the pieces on the ground,

Perhaps you mean those with too small "American Airlines" marks.
All this is discussed here, Gordon in English

http://perso.wanadoo.fr/jpdesm/penta...n/wr-redl.html

....
"Facts :

The presence of these wreckage pieces on several pictures authenticate
them.
The radius of the edge of the red letter on the often shown Mark
Faram's picture is two times smaller that the one found in the logos
"American Airlines" painted on the Boeing 757.
The size of the "C" letter on the wrecked piece is around 60% of the
size of the "C" letter on the body of the B 757.
The radius of the edge of the red letter on the picture showing a
group of running men is coherent with the radius of the logo letters
on B 757 N 644 AA.
The witnesses can be divided into two groups : those who perceived the
average dimensions of the plane and have seen a small commuter jet,
and those who perceived the logo and colors, including the "AA" sign
on the tail, the general appearance of the plane, and recognized a B
757 or an Airbus of American Airlines.
Conclusions :
First hypothese : the picture of Mark Faram and the one with the "C"
letter are not faked. In this case :
Somebody painted an "American" logo about two times smaller than a
B757 one's on the body of the plane which dived into the pentagon.
If this plane was much smaller than a B 757, (size of a commuter
plane) it was a trick to make it seen as the flight 77 for somebody
looking at it from far away.
If this plane was an airliner, it would have been painted for the
circumstance, with letters smaller than those used by American
Airlines on a B 757.
All witnesses have seen the same plane, and it is likely that they saw
a plane smaller than a B 757, though it could be similar from sight.
There is an anomaly with the debris shown aside the running men, with
a radius two times larger than on the other pictures.


Second hypothese : the images of Mark Faram and the "C" letter are
faked. In this case :
All the debris could come from a Boeing 757 of American Airlines.
The infographist who massaged Mark Faram's photo and the "C" letter
photo, probably to show that these debris were located on the logo
"American" of the B 757, had no idea of dimensions, perspective, 3D
construction, metal sheet deformations under stress, real light
effects on 3D objects. He is just an ace of Photoshop. Already seen
this conclusion, isn't it ?
Mark Faram, who shot this debris on the Pentagon's lawn and owns the
original of this picture, is either this infographist, either he is
party to this fraud.
....
"

Michael

legions of people discuss it and
try to educate your atrophied, tunnel-visioned mind and the end result is that
you wipe it all away and start over - for no reason other than an intense need
for attention for little Michael...

Gordon