![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 30, 7:00*am, wrote:
which would you feel more comfortable behind? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Either, assuming I had done the conversion. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- What hp do you believe the type IV can produce,using your given reliability constraints? -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- My T-4 experience is limited and I'd prefer not to guess. Any talk of 'Horsepower' would have to be based on verified, reproducible figures from a torque stand. As for my 'reliability constraints' there's really only two: The modifications done to the lubrication system being the one and attaching the prop to the clutch-end of the crankshaft being the other. The interesting point here is that the Type 4 engine already has the lubrication mods BUILT-IN... indeed, ALL modern engines do. As for driving a propeller from the pulley-hub of a crankshaft, this was a post-war expedient which worked fine up to about 25bhp but became a constant source of trouble -- and of increasingly complex and costly 'fixes' from that day to this, when in fact the best solution is to simply do what is done with ALL OTHER engine conversions and put the prop on the clutch-end of the crankshaft, which certainly makes more sense in that the Type4 uses a flanged crankshaft . ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Could you estimate the installed weight differences *between the installations? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- An honest figure is probably about thirty pounds. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Type IV is the only truly modern air-cooled engine Volkswagen has every produced. In doing so they drew heavily from the Corvair. Some aspects were better than the Corvair; a few were worse (such as the valve seats) but on the whole the 1700 and it's follow-on's (ie, 1800 and 2000) offered the homebuilder a rare opportunity. Alas, due to the untimely death of the CEO the company fell into the hands of the bean-counters and the moment was missed, relegating the Type IV to a minor role and continuing to slap patches onto the Type I despite the myriad flags of warning that it's day had long since passed. If you happen to have a Type IV -- and a tame machinist with a heavy background in converting auto engines for flight, in my opinion you'd be wise to consider using it in your Jodel. -R.S.Hoover |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Engine-out procedures and eccentric forces on engine pylons | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 18 | May 26th 07 01:03 AM |
Westland Wyvern Prototype - RR Eagle Engine - Rolls Royce Eagle 24cyl Liq Cooled Engine.jpg | Ramapo | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 17th 07 09:14 PM |
Saturn V F-1 Engine Testing at F-1 Engine Test Stand 6866986.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 1 | April 11th 07 04:48 PM |
F-1 Engine for the Saturn V S-IC (first) stage depicts the complexity of the engine 6413912.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 9th 07 01:38 PM |
1710 allison v-12 engine WWII p 38 engine | Holger Stephan | Home Built | 9 | August 21st 03 08:53 AM |