A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Hiroshima V. Berlin.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6  
Old December 27th 03, 12:57 AM
Charles Gray
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 26 Dec 2003 20:54:28 GMT, (B2431) wrote:



Look, your admiration for the Nazis doesn't change the fact that Germany was
not "intact."

The fuel that should have been used training new pilots was used by front line
aircraft which were being flown by increasingly fewer experienced pilots and
dropping out of the skies in huge numbers. Those "thousands" of aircraft being
built underground, actually dozens, had no hope of ever saving your beloved
Reich. Had they gone into service many would have been destroyed in accidents
or by air strikes before ever seeing combat.


Or been jumped by U.S. fighters-- I'm given to understand that one
of the favorite late war US tactics was to wait until the german
fighers, low on gas, we're returning to their base, and then destroy
them.




Your observation that Germany still occupied territory beyond its borders is no
different from Japan at the time they surrendered.

If Germany was so "intact" why was the Marshal Plan needed?

well, to be fair, the Marshal plan was deisgned to avoid much of
what had trasnpired before WWII-- well fed, prosperous people are less
likely to elect dictators.
IMO, of all the US foreign aid ever spent, the Marshal plan and the
aid that went to Japan (don't know if it actually had an official
name) has got to go down as the most cost effective aid we ever gave
anyone.



Admire those Nazi pigs all you want, but at least be honest with their actual
track record.

By the way, those late war submarines were a waste of money and resources.


If Germany had started their late war aircraft production by 1943,
and the late war subs by 1943 (when they could have been built), the
war might have stretched out considerably longer-- but ended the same
i the end. The biggest difference is that we would have seen the
first A-bombs used over Germany, not Japan.
Of course, apologists often fail to note that th reason why such
programs were not instituted (hell, for that matter why Germanydidn't
go on a full wartime footing until 1943) was part and parcel of the
Nazi leadership.



Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired


Here's a question--until I got to college, I recall reading all
these books about german wartime production, how incredible it was,
etc. Every movie has a secret german production, etc, etc.
why is that, given that Germany had perhaps the LEAST effecient
system of R&D and most especially, of allocating resources of any fo
the major powers of WWII?
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other magnificent technological achievements me Military Aviation 146 January 15th 04 10:13 PM
Hiroshima justified? (was Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other magnificent technological achievements) B2431 Military Aviation 100 January 12th 04 01:48 PM
Hiroshima justified? (Invasion should have been attempted at the very least if not carried thru) Greg Moritz Military Aviation 29 December 31st 03 05:56 PM
Hiroshima justified? (was Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other magnificent technological achievements) Dick Locke Military Aviation 4 December 27th 03 07:52 AM
Hiroshima justified? (was Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and othermagnificent technological achievements) mrraveltay Military Aviation 7 December 23rd 03 01:01 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.