![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Ash writes:
This is the kind of amusing idealism that is common from someone not very well versed in the real world. I don't think there's anything idealistic about it. My guess is that certification of engines is so extraordinarily expensive, and private plane owners are so (relatively) poor, that nobody could afford to pay for a truly modern piston engine. So the same designs are used for decades. The situation is different with airlines, because they have more money and can save more money. The economics favor advances in engine design and control, and certification is much less of an expense. At least that's my guess. But it does keep private pilots back in the 1940s. I used to feel the same way, but reality simply is not cooperative in this respect. Technology can compensate to some degree. You no longer need to know very much about cars at all to own one (for which I am eternally grateful). But you still need to know some things. The car can't protect you against everything. You still have to think about when to get your oil changed (even if the computer reminds you), you still have to know that shifting into reverse while on the highway is not a good move, etc. Yes, but you don't have to adjust mixture and timing as you drive. You don't have to worry about the exhaust temperature. You have a cooling system that doesn't vary dramatically in efficiency with your speed. And so on. But automobile engines require virtually nothing in the way of certification. This has become apparent in some cases when computer controls added to engines have misbehaved, because manufacturers never bother to design and test them adequately. The consequences of that would be much worse in the air. If you think engine management is distracting, you should see what *I* have to go through to stay aloft. All sorts of thinking going on there. And yet I and every other glider pilot manages to fly the plane too. But glider pilots like going through the extra stuff, otherwise they wouldn't be glider pilots. And you don't have to worry about an engine. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Full Stalls Power Off | w3n-a | Soaring | 5 | December 4th 08 10:29 PM |
Full Stalls Power On | w3n-a | Piloting | 0 | December 4th 08 02:30 PM |
Can hydraulic lifters cause inadequate full power? | [email protected] | Owning | 13 | October 23rd 08 07:40 PM |
Radio protocol regarding full stops on full stop only nights | Ben Hallert | Piloting | 33 | February 9th 05 07:52 PM |
4--O-470 pistons,used | jerry Wass | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | August 17th 04 05:07 PM |