![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... The AIRFRAME is an example of a structure having optimized ratios of strength-to-weight. Although the very best materials are expensive, the cost of materials is not linear with regard to strength. Going to other-than-optimum materials... giving away perhaps 10% of our strength... which may also be read as increasing our WEIGHT by 10%... or reducing our LOAD by 10%.... does not reflect a price redduction of 10%... what it reflects is more on the order of a 90% REDUCTION in price. -R.S.Hoover ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I can't speak exactly to the percentages, but it still a very important point. Same can often be said for the investment in engineering time. Kind of makes you wonder how long our automobiles would last if they spent an extra 10% on cost or weight. I just had an 06 Explorer with independent rear suspension and an aluminum differential case, hang it's tongue out at 90k miles. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|