![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Alan Minyard" wrote in message ... On Sun, 21 Dec 2003 11:42:40 GMT, "weary" wrote: "Alan Minyard" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 11:08:15 GMT, "weary" wrote: "B2431" wrote in message ... From: "weary" Do you think Saddam Hussein had the same right to use WMD to save the lives of Iraqi servicemen while fighting Iran and internal rebellion? Did Al-Qaeda have the same right to deliberately target civilians in their war with the USA, specifically WTC? If Saddam hadn't invaded Iran there would not have been a need to defend "Iraqi servicemen." Complaints about his use of WMD relate to uses considerably pre-dating his invasion of Kuwait. As for the attacks on the WTC there was no military value there. An argument could be made for the strike on the Pentagon being a military attack. Nagasaki and Hiroshima each had valid military targets within the cities. The odds are that there were Reservists in the WTC at the time of the attack. The poster I was replying to advocated using "ANY MEANS" to end the war. He also wrote "If that means incinerating two, three, or however many Japanese Cities by the bombs carried by the 509th's B-29s, so be it." He made no mention of destroying military assets. His choice of words clearly states that the destruction of cities was what would produce a Japanese surrender, not destruction of military assets. Destruction of Japan, by whatever means possible, was warranted. That's what AQ thinks of the USA And it is clear that you think that they are right. They are not, and we will hunt them down. An irrational conclusion from what I wrote, but what I expect from you. The barbarity of their military was an abomination, and it was continuing daily That's what AQ thinks of the USA. Once again, you think that they are right. And once again an irrational conclusion. You are either massively mis-informed or you simply hate the US. Actually I'm just stating or summarising what is in the public domain regarding statements by AQ. In either case, welcome to my kill file. Tell someone who cares. A very mature response to hearing bad news - shoot the messenger. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|