![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If "[t]he current administration seems to have little qualms about using
them [nukes] to bully other parties into compliance...," why are US soldiers dieing in Iraq and Afghanistan while no nukes have been used? If you are correct in your judgment on the "current administration," surely it would have just nuked Iraq in the first place and not lost so many of its soldier's lives. Show us, with logic, that you aren't just full of ****. "Rob van Riel" wrote in message om... (Bill Negraeff) wrote in message om... I think the US will wait until everybody else disarms and destroys their WMDs. Remember, unlike all those other countries, the US has these things for purely defensive purposes. That's pretty much the heart of the matter, isn't it? Do we, or do we not, believe that the US would only use its nukes in self defence, that is, either as a deterrant or retalliation to a similar attack? The current administration seems to have little qualms about using them to bully other parties into compliance or, given the research into nuclear 'bunker busters', to actually use them as whim or convenience dictate. Rob |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|