![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 15, 11:43*am, Charles Vincent wrote:
bildan wrote: You might like this.http://ibis.experimentals.de/downloa...lvibration.pdf I've read this several times in the past. *What strikes me is the absence of test equipment like wireless load cell torque sensors on the shafts. *If used, any torsion oscillations could be seen on an oscilloscope long before they became destructive. You must have missed the fact that this all took place in the early sixties and seventies. * Even if they had practical wireless sensors for this, they didn't have the compute power available economically to process it. *Having said that, you still have to account for the effects of the sensor. *For that matter I think that wireless sensors and attendant equipment are still not practical for the average modern homebuilder. I didn't miss it. I did tests like this in the early 1960's. Load cells are just Wheatstone Bridges and the wireless tech WAS available then - it just used discrete components instead of IC's. It needs no computer power whatsoever since it's an analog signal. If you don't like wireless tech, slip rings are available. The sensors are very light and have little or no effect on the shaft under test - if they did, no one would use them. In any event, you can put an accelerometer on a shaft bearing housing and see if it's output changes when you remove the torque sensor. The only reason they didn't use instrumentation must have been that Bede was cheap and in a hurry. It was definitely available and not expensive. Torsional resonance instrumentation is absolutely practical for home builders and it doesn't cost all that much. The oscilloscope is probably the most expensive thing and you could probably borrow one. If I were going to do the auto engine shaft drive thing, I'd buy a cheap running engine from a junk yard. If it ran rough, so much the better. I'd build up the firewall forward drive system on a trailer with a club prop. Then I'd run it to find and eliminate resonances. Only then would I build an exact replica of the flight article using new components and run that on the test stand. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A Simple Auto Engine Conversion | [email protected] | Home Built | 57 | September 14th 08 09:31 PM |
A Simple Auto Engine Conversion | [email protected] | Home Built | 2 | August 28th 08 01:06 PM |
A Simple Auto Engine Conversion | [email protected] | Home Built | 0 | August 28th 08 04:35 AM |
Auto-Engine Conversion Oil Cooler | D.W. Taylor | Home Built | 0 | April 29th 05 05:30 AM |
C172 Penn Yan 180 HP Engine Conversion | John Roncallo | Owning | 4 | October 20th 03 06:42 PM |