A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

another poor man's car engine conversion



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9  
Old February 15th 09, 08:59 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
bildan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 646
Default another poor man's car engine conversion

On Feb 15, 11:43*am, Charles Vincent wrote:
bildan wrote:
You might like this.http://ibis.experimentals.de/downloa...lvibration.pdf


I've read this several times in the past. *What strikes me is the
absence of test equipment like wireless load cell torque sensors on
the shafts. *If used, any torsion oscillations could be seen on an
oscilloscope long before they became destructive.


You must have missed the fact that this all took place in the early
sixties and seventies. * Even if they had practical wireless sensors for
this, they didn't have the compute power available economically to
process it. *Having said that, you still have to account for the effects
of the sensor. *For that matter I think that wireless sensors and
attendant equipment are still not practical for the average modern
homebuilder.


I didn't miss it. I did tests like this in the early 1960's. Load
cells are just Wheatstone Bridges and the wireless tech WAS available
then - it just used discrete components instead of IC's. It needs no
computer power whatsoever since it's an analog signal. If you don't
like wireless tech, slip rings are available.

The sensors are very light and have little or no effect on the shaft
under test - if they did, no one would use them. In any event, you
can put an accelerometer on a shaft bearing housing and see if it's
output changes when you remove the torque sensor.

The only reason they didn't use instrumentation must have been that
Bede was cheap and in a hurry. It was definitely available and not
expensive.

Torsional resonance instrumentation is absolutely practical for home
builders and it doesn't cost all that much. The oscilloscope is
probably the most expensive thing and you could probably borrow one.

If I were going to do the auto engine shaft drive thing, I'd buy a
cheap running engine from a junk yard. If it ran rough, so much the
better. I'd build up the firewall forward drive system on a trailer
with a club prop. Then I'd run it to find and eliminate resonances.
Only then would I build an exact replica of the flight article using
new components and run that on the test stand.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A Simple Auto Engine Conversion [email protected] Home Built 57 September 14th 08 09:31 PM
A Simple Auto Engine Conversion [email protected] Home Built 2 August 28th 08 01:06 PM
A Simple Auto Engine Conversion [email protected] Home Built 0 August 28th 08 04:35 AM
Auto-Engine Conversion Oil Cooler D.W. Taylor Home Built 0 April 29th 05 05:30 AM
C172 Penn Yan 180 HP Engine Conversion John Roncallo Owning 4 October 20th 03 06:42 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.