![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Yanik wrote in message ...
Glenfiddich wrote in : Those 'bunker buster' nukes have been proposed for destroying and sterilising buried stocks of germ warfare material. For THAT purpose, their use is eminently sensible and logically defensible. The alternatives - allowing an enemy to deploy such weapons, or acccidentally dispersing them with a conventional attack - are NOT attractive. Not to mention the fact that it would very conveniently free the US of the burden of proving that such weapons existed in the first place. Instead of merely claiming the weapons are there, but kind of hard to find, it could now claim huge stockpiles existed, and were wiped out with 100% success by the nukes. Very neat. Rob |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|