![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chad Irby wrote:
:My original point was that the F-35 is going to have a combat range :about 50% higher than the F-18 E/F according to the specs. Even the source you gave (FAS) doesn't claim that. What they say is combat range about 50% higher than the F/A-18C/D (not Super Hornet) ON INTERNAL FUEL. Note that the Super Hornet has about 40% more range than the Hornet. Now, would you like to rethink that remark? So let's go with FAS as a source. Combat radius for the F-35 is given as "600+ nautical miles". Combat radius for the F/A-18C/D is given with the statement of "Depending on the mission and loading, combat radius is greater than 500 nautical miles". Combat radius of the Super Hornet is given as "up to 40% greater than the C/D", which when you work the math out gives 700+ nautical miles. You figure it out. :If it misses its range by as much as five or ten percent, it will still :have a *much* higher unrefueled range than the F-18. There hasn't been an airplane designated as "F-18" since 1987. Using FAS for numbers, it appears that the Super Hornet already has more range than the F-35 by a good margin, even if the F-35 meets spec. :Since I've already *agreed* that it could miss by a small amount, and :since you keep *arguing* about it, that means you must disagree with :those numbers. : :So pick a number. What's the *worst* you think it could be? : :If it's not more than about five or ten percent, then you're arguing :with Fred on this one, not me... Well, no, because you persist in misunderstanding what I'm saying. Do you believe the numbers I give above? I don't, for typical combat missions. The range for F/A-18 is grossly overstated in that case (for both variants). SO IS THAT OF THE F-35! And I expect that games are going to have to be played to meet the spec (no load, most favourable flight regime, etc) once all the issues with the airplane (in everything but the baseline version) get shaken out in real flights of real articles crashing onto real aircraft carriers and/or taking off from real parking lots. You get it now? -- "Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute." -- Charles Pinckney |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 1st 04 02:31 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | June 2nd 04 07:17 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | April 5th 04 03:04 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 2 | February 2nd 04 11:41 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |