*********A DEFENCE FOR MXMORAN***********

"Ibby" wrote in message
...
Perhaps a sock,,,,, for ??????????? you-know-who????????

You couldn't convince me otherwise, without a very solid proof.

It is the same 'ole-same-'ole with a different name, it seems to me.

;-))
--
Jim in NC

Morgan

First time on here but some ppl here no my name like ManhattanMan
(Don) for one and Beech45Whiskey (Peter).
I'm not French (thank God, I'm Irish). As I've just said to Jim I'm
trying to add some constructive defense to FSX. yes it's perhaps not
perfect but it does have its benefits and with the correct quality
payware (additional purchased software) it is highly detailed and has
very well modelled and detailed flightdecks with fully operational
systems etc.

Ibby

------------------------------------

If you think a computer literate group of pilots needs you take on the value
of MSFS, then you are as full of yourself (and ****) as Mx.

I can assure you, we can function quite well without your and Mixie's
chatter. If we want to discuss such, which obviously we don't, we prefer to
do it with experience pilots. We don't need some wanna be offering
speculation disguised as fact, and then arguing like a 10 year old when he
finds he is wrong.