![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 6, 7:31 pm, "BT" wrote:
The thing about "older" POH, like your 1965 C-210.. they were not that explict. Dependent on the engine, some say keep RPM higher than MP, some don't. But moving the controls in the wrong order can put the engine outside its operational limitations. For instance, if the POH allows 24" and 2200 RPM, that setting isn't within the old "square" rule-of- thumb but it won't hurt the engine. Now, if you pull the prop back to 2200 with the throttle wide open, you're going to get may 25 or 26" MP and 2200 RPM, well outside the limits set by the manufacturer. The risk with large-bore, slow-turning engines is detonation, and the POH tables are designed with avoiding detonation and the awesome damage it causes. So that's why we teach people to avoid high cylinder pressures by reding MP first, then setting RPM. If increasing power, get the RPM up first and then increase MP. It's no different than upshifting or downshifting your car; you don't just mash the throttle to the floor when you come to a steep hill; you downshift first and then apply the power, and when you get to the top of the hill you don't upshift until the car's speed is such that the engine won't have to drop to some very low RPM when you let the clutch out and apply the power again. We older guys can remember a time when cars would "ping" or "knock" when the engine was driven at a low RPM and too much throttle. That was detonation and it would break rings and knock holes in pistons and trash the bearings and sometimes heads and cylinder walls would crack. It was considered very poor driving technique. Now we have cars with computers and knock sensors and all sorts of electronic wizardry that keeps the driver from breaking stuff, but it also dumbs down young drivers and they can't grasp the RPM/MP thing quite so easily. And automatic transmissions and ABS brakes have made driving habits even worse, IMHO. Dan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Right prop, wrong prop? Wood prop, metal prop? | Gus Rasch | Aerobatics | 1 | February 14th 08 10:18 PM |
Head wind takeoff into rising hills, or crosswind takeoff to open space ?? | P S | Piloting | 7 | September 20th 07 07:29 PM |
Question on Baron 58 prop control | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 62 | December 3rd 06 05:26 AM |
You Want Control? You Can't Handle Control! -- Was 140 dead | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 0 | March 2nd 04 08:48 PM |
Hydraulic CS prop converting to Adjustable prop? | Scott VanderVeen | Home Built | 0 | December 5th 03 05:54 PM |