![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
AlexB wrote: You've just sent me off to the plates and you're quite right! I'm still pleased about the dropping the ADF requirement though. I don't have any of the old plates around. Did all this coincide with removing the LOM? I definitely remember that PAE had one but don't remember TIW. I have plates from February 1998. The FAF for the KPAE ILS RWY 16R localizer approach was RITTS LOM, it was also the IAF and the missed approach holding fix. The KTIW ILS RWY 17 of that time was AMDT 8, the only significant difference between it and the present AMDT 8A appears to be the removal of the MM. When they first commissioned the ILS RWY 17L to KGYI they had a ADF required for the hold. I never understood why you couldn't use the localizer, the outer marker, and or the 302 degree radial to define the holding point. I sent a letter to the designers, and they came back saying in their haste that they did make it more complicated. They moved the hold to URH VOR that was some 30 miles away. I withdrew my request and they went back to the ADF required on the approach. My idea was to fly the missed approach, to to fly the local backwards to intercept the 302 degree radial and hold. But the designers didn't like that. -- Regards, Ross C-172F 180HP Sold ![]() KSWI |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bendix KT76C transponder requires major repair: Options? | Peter R. | Owning | 20 | September 14th 06 07:48 PM |
Parachuting or Piloting Requires Instant Decision Making..........tv clip | Hans | Piloting | 6 | June 19th 06 02:29 PM |
Garmin 430 error message: "com requires service"??? | Guy Byars | Owning | 2 | July 26th 05 02:28 AM |
S-TEC 60-2 requires re-trim after altitude hold? | Peter R. | Owning | 7 | March 2nd 04 03:46 PM |
Section 61.89a(8) requires student compliance w/ instructor limitations | Shoulbe | Soaring | 0 | August 25th 03 08:30 PM |