![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kyle,
What has been the experiences with the other members of your EAA chapter with their "Certified" engines for this last year? Why did the first homebuilt engine quit? I don't buy the second issue as an engine issue. If you don't build anything right its gonna fail. I can't believe that the airplane was above its gross weight with a single pilot and a homebuilt engine. I can buy the third issue. But what if it was a FADEC on a Cont or a LYC instead? They quit without juice as well. I'm not being argumentative, but want more details so my auto-conversion will be more successful than a LYC or Cont install. Thanks -- Bart D. Hull Tempe, Arizona Check http://www.inficad.com/~bdhull/engine.html for my Subaru Engine Conversion Check http://www.inficad.com/~bdhull/fuselage.html for Tango II I'm building. Kyle Boatright wrote: "Jerry Springer" wrote in message ink.net... Better way? New design yes... auto engines no. Sorry I have not been flying quite as long as Barnyard, only about 40 years for me. BUT every auto engine conversion I know of has had a failure of some type. Do Lycosaurs fail? Yes they do, but tell there are some solid percentages comparing the number flying versus the number of hours Bob is right to be skeptical. Maybe the engine itself is not to blame, but tell all the components are tried and test I would not not ask my family or passengers to ride in an auto powered aircraft over hostile terrain. Jerry Building on what Jerry said... "My" EAA chapter has 3 members with Auto Conversion powered aircraft. One of them was totalled this spring when the engine failed. A second was totalled this fall when the gear failed because the stock gear wasn't up to the task of hauling around all of the extra weight. The third aircraft s still flying, but has had at least two engine out experiences, both of which turned out to be problems keeping his engine's electronic brain-box supplied with electrons. In both cases the aircraft was close enough to an airport to make an uneventful dead stick landing. Bottom line, your risks are significantly increased if you use an auto conversion. Neither the engine or structure is designed with that purpose in mind, and the systems will (generally) be more complex than a Lyc or Continental. Sure, it can be done properly, but more are done the *wrong* way than the right way. KB |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
human powered flight | patrick timony | Home Built | 10 | September 16th 03 03:38 AM |
Illusive elastic powered Ornithopter | Mike Hindle | Home Built | 6 | September 15th 03 03:32 PM |
Pre-Rotator Powered by Compressed Air? | nuke | Home Built | 8 | July 30th 03 12:36 PM |
Powered Parachute Plans | MJC | Home Built | 4 | July 15th 03 07:29 PM |
Powered Parachute Plans- correction | Cy Galley | Home Built | 0 | July 11th 03 03:43 AM |