![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Wanttaja wrote:
Probably your biggest worry, compared to a Lycosaur, is cooling. The air cooling of your classic aircraft engine is extremely reliable...if it cools properly when it's initially installed, there's very little that can happen to it to make it NOT cool. If the oil cooler quits working, the engine probably will last long enough to get you to a runway (other than if it spews oil everywhere, of course). You're not going to match that level of reliability; your airplane will have a water pump, water hoses, and radiator that the Lycosaur lacks and thus can't stop running if they quit. The lesson here is probably to use the best quality parts you can find (race-type hoses, etc.) and to oversize the system... if you develop a coolant leak in flight, it's nice if your plane has to lose five gallons of coolant before it starts to overheat rather than five quarts. Gauge the heck out of it, too...you want to be able to detect problems as early as possible. I'd try put together some sort of annunciator system rather than depend on the pilot's eyes to catch a fading gauge. All good suggestions. Another tack on the cooling system failure would be to select an auto engine (or engineer its conversion) such that loss of coolant does not cause a catastrophic failure. For example (and it's only an example!) the Mazda Wankel engine will happily continue to run and produce usable power without any coolant remaining. It will likely never start again, however, without a major rebuild. Why is this? Because when overheating, the aluminum rotor housings expand more than the cast iron rotors, which precludes seizing (unlike most piston engines). Parts of the engine permanently deform however, causing insufficient compression once the engine cools. Thus, no start. I guess my point is: sometimes we should try to prevent the failure, and other times we should try to minimize the effect of the failure. There's a balance in there somewhere. I wonder what could be done along the lines of emergency cooling, like the emergency ignition? The AVweb article about flying the Hawker Hurricane makes me wonder about a spray-bar system for auto-engine conversions. Could you gain some flying time if you had a system that would spray the engine itself with water? And/Or some emergency cowl flaps that would open and expose the engine case directly to the slipstream? The radiator's area is many times the surface area of the engine's water jacket. Plus the now empty water jacket makes a real nice air gap blanket for the cylinders. You'd do better to engineer a coolant-loss makeup system. IMHO. Unfortunately, "make-up coolant" weighs 7.5 lbs. / gallon. Fly in the rain with a big funnel? Secondary use for that "relief tube" ? :-) Or perhaps have the pistons machined from some alloy with a low Cte (titanium?) and make them as undersized (relative to the cylinder diameter) as the rings will permit. Russell Kent |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
human powered flight | patrick timony | Home Built | 10 | September 16th 03 03:38 AM |
Illusive elastic powered Ornithopter | Mike Hindle | Home Built | 6 | September 15th 03 03:32 PM |
Pre-Rotator Powered by Compressed Air? | nuke | Home Built | 8 | July 30th 03 12:36 PM |
Powered Parachute Plans | MJC | Home Built | 4 | July 15th 03 07:29 PM |
Powered Parachute Plans- correction | Cy Galley | Home Built | 0 | July 11th 03 03:43 AM |