Skydiving and FAA regs

On May 28, 9:31*am, "good grief" wrote:
Yep. One of the most realistic moments in the latest Star Trek film
was the ad hoc tandem jump of Kirk and Sulu. Upon deployment Kirk's
canopy is immediately ripped away. Although (IIRC) the film indicated
a riser-harness (french links! those *******s!) failure it is more
likely that a riser connection would fail or seams would rip leading
to a 'blown out' canopy. That's one of the reasons tandem jumps use
drogue chutes.

That "realistic" tandem jump was preceded by a jump from orbit.
Actually, if you paid attention to the dialog (albeit brief) the
mining platform was not 'in orbit' but was rather 'in hover'. *Thus
the jump was not 'from orbit' and was not subject to re-entry
conditions. *Instead it was more akin to Joe Kittinger's jump in 1960
from 102,000 feet in a balloon.
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question...cs/q0243.shtml

Boy! that'd be a bitch to "spot"!........ with the DZ moving at 1000 mph
below you and the surface dragging the atmosphere with it. I guess you could
drop some streamers. ;-)

I wonder how you'd do the "hover" thing? *Also, I haven't seen the movie yet
but WTF could they possibly be mining in open space? Dark matter?

~ tp

Hmmm...don't want to spoil it for you. The platform is hovering over
Vulcan...and you're in the ballpark with the 'matter'. They matched
rotation so it was a relative work hover g. Three jumpers in the
scene and one is wearing red...guess who 'wins' the low pull contest?

Similar to all my buddies ragging on me for shooting video- I liked
freefall RW, just didn't like to touch anyone- just 'hover'.