![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom L. wrote:
I don't think we should start panicking just yet. I am not panicking, just calling a lawyer and getting myself a BFR (that's called a** covering, panic comes later :-) 61.56(e) talks about "FAA sponsored pilot proficiency award program". Both old and new WINGS were/are exactly that, so either one qualifies. Whether the AC is updated or not does not matter. Well, my local FSDO (and AOPA) disagree, and both told me that the old WINGS phases no longer qualify. And since that all I have to show today, I am worrying. They might very well be both wrong though, this wouldn't be the first time, but I don't want to be the guy having to argue that in a court of law, or with my insurance company, or with the FAA after a ramp check... As for the faasafety web site, it says: "Pilots participating in the WINGS - Pilot Proficiency Program to at least the Basic Phase need not accomplish the flight review requirements of 14 CFR part 61, if since the beginning of the 24th calendar month before the month in which that pilot acts as pilot in command, he or she has satisfactorily completed or currently holds the Basic or higher WINGS - Pilot Proficiency Program phase in an aircraft (reference 61.56(e))." Here is the thing: on the one hand, something that I can read on the interwebs, on the other hand an advisory circular still in effect that says otherwise. I know that I am splitting hair here, but hair splitting, longitudinally and diagonally, is precisely what lawyers and civil servants and insurance assessors do. If your new Wing phase does not include three phases of training, of one hour each, as described in AC 61-91H paragraph 7.a (if you are an airplane pilot) and a safety meeting or equivalent as described in paragraph 7.h of the same document, with the required signatures and logbook endorsement, etc. that go with it, then you have not met the requirements of 61.56(e). ....and call me a wimp, but I have a problem with that. --Sylvain |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wings Program, SoCal, USA, Thurs 7-12-07 Desert Summer Flying | CindyB | Piloting | 2 | July 12th 07 05:31 AM |
Wings Program, SoCal, USA, Thurs 7-12-07 Desert Summer Flying | CindyB | Soaring | 2 | July 12th 07 05:31 AM |
E6-B program for HP 15C | Chris W | Piloting | 5 | June 12th 05 02:17 AM |
X-Wings and Canard Rotor Wings. | Charles Gray | Rotorcraft | 1 | March 22nd 05 12:26 AM |
Program about the B-26 | vincent p. norris | Military Aviation | 1 | January 1st 04 01:41 AM |