A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

reynolds number



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #2  
Old June 22nd 09, 06:34 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
cavelamb[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 257
Default reynolds number

jan olieslagers wrote:
It's been puzzling me for a long while and there it is again popping up
in the "WIG airfoils" thread: what is this sacred Reynolds number?
I tried our alther friend en.wikipedia but its theory was quite beyond
my level of education* and its examples of oil in a pipe were not really
illuminating - not to mention the spermatozoa and the Major League
Baseball.

Is it a property of the wing, or of the whole plane, or do the fuselage
and wing and empennage &C each have their own Reynolds number?
I seem to understand this figure is a measure of aerodymanic quality?
Given a plane's weight and engine power, will it be faster (or slower)
for a higher Reynolds number?

Excuse my stupidity,
KA


*I am only a modest Solaris sysadmin, never went to university...


Detailed explanation at:
http://www.aerodrag.com/Articles/ReynoldsNumber.htm

Here's a simple example for a wing with a 10 feet chord at 100 mph
flying speed, at Sea Level and "Standard Day" conditions.

Re = 9346 x 100 x 10 = 9346 x 1000 = 9,346,000.


Reynold's Magic Number basically shows the ratio between inertial
forces and viscous forces in a fluid.

Think of it as (how fast it's moving) / (how sticky it is).

At low R, viscous forces predominate. (and generally laminar flow)
At high R, is dominated by inertial forces. (resulting in higher sheer
forces and turbulence)


Straight from wiki...

If an airplane wing needs testing, one can make a scaled down model of the wing
and test it in a wind tunnel using the same Reynolds number that the actual
airplane is subjected to. If for example the scale model has linear dimensions
one quarter of full size, the flow velocity would have to be increased four
times to obtain similar flow behaviour.

Alternatively, tests could be conducted in a water tank instead of in air
(provided the compressibility effects of air are not significant). As the
kinematic viscosity of water is around 13 times less than that of air at 15 °C,
in this case the scale model would need to be about one thirteenth the size in
all dimensions to maintain the same Reynolds number, assuming the full-scale
flow velocity was used.

The results of the laboratory model will be similar to those of the actual plane
wing results. Thus there is no need to bring a full scale plane into the lab and
actually test it. This is an example of "dynamic similarity".

Reynolds number is important in the calculation of a body's drag
characteristics. A notable example is that of the flow around a cylinder. Above
roughly 3×106 Re the drag coefficient drops considerably. This is important when
calculating the optimal cruise speeds for low drag (and therefore long range)
profiles for airplanes.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Minden Pilots - Ping Jim Reynolds Al Soaring 0 July 14th 06 06:45 PM
Reynolds: "Come Out of the White House with Your Hands Up!" mrtravel Piloting 2 May 16th 06 08:28 PM
Reynolds: "Come Out of the White House with Your Hands Up!" [email protected] Piloting 0 May 9th 06 04:11 AM
Clark G. Reynolds dies Jim Beaver Naval Aviation 0 December 22nd 05 07:48 AM
Pitts Number 1 registration number Mirco Aerobatics 3 December 4th 04 11:50 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.