![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jan olieslagers wrote:
It's been puzzling me for a long while and there it is again popping up in the "WIG airfoils" thread: what is this sacred Reynolds number? I tried our alther friend en.wikipedia but its theory was quite beyond my level of education* and its examples of oil in a pipe were not really illuminating - not to mention the spermatozoa and the Major League Baseball. Is it a property of the wing, or of the whole plane, or do the fuselage and wing and empennage &C each have their own Reynolds number? I seem to understand this figure is a measure of aerodymanic quality? Given a plane's weight and engine power, will it be faster (or slower) for a higher Reynolds number? Excuse my stupidity, KA *I am only a modest Solaris sysadmin, never went to university... Detailed explanation at: http://www.aerodrag.com/Articles/ReynoldsNumber.htm Here's a simple example for a wing with a 10 feet chord at 100 mph flying speed, at Sea Level and "Standard Day" conditions. Re = 9346 x 100 x 10 = 9346 x 1000 = 9,346,000. Reynold's Magic Number basically shows the ratio between inertial forces and viscous forces in a fluid. Think of it as (how fast it's moving) / (how sticky it is). At low R, viscous forces predominate. (and generally laminar flow) At high R, is dominated by inertial forces. (resulting in higher sheer forces and turbulence) Straight from wiki... If an airplane wing needs testing, one can make a scaled down model of the wing and test it in a wind tunnel using the same Reynolds number that the actual airplane is subjected to. If for example the scale model has linear dimensions one quarter of full size, the flow velocity would have to be increased four times to obtain similar flow behaviour. Alternatively, tests could be conducted in a water tank instead of in air (provided the compressibility effects of air are not significant). As the kinematic viscosity of water is around 13 times less than that of air at 15 °C, in this case the scale model would need to be about one thirteenth the size in all dimensions to maintain the same Reynolds number, assuming the full-scale flow velocity was used. The results of the laboratory model will be similar to those of the actual plane wing results. Thus there is no need to bring a full scale plane into the lab and actually test it. This is an example of "dynamic similarity". Reynolds number is important in the calculation of a body's drag characteristics. A notable example is that of the flow around a cylinder. Above roughly 3×106 Re the drag coefficient drops considerably. This is important when calculating the optimal cruise speeds for low drag (and therefore long range) profiles for airplanes. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Minden Pilots - Ping Jim Reynolds | Al | Soaring | 0 | July 14th 06 06:45 PM |
Reynolds: "Come Out of the White House with Your Hands Up!" | mrtravel | Piloting | 2 | May 16th 06 08:28 PM |
Reynolds: "Come Out of the White House with Your Hands Up!" | [email protected] | Piloting | 0 | May 9th 06 04:11 AM |
Clark G. Reynolds dies | Jim Beaver | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 22nd 05 07:48 AM |
Pitts Number 1 registration number | Mirco | Aerobatics | 3 | December 4th 04 11:50 AM |