A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

A fair opportunity to compete?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #26  
Old July 13th 09, 09:36 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Chip Bearden[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 93
Default A fair opportunity to compete?

Whether it should be incumbent on the CD to poll the last launchers in
each class to ensure they are getting up before opening the gate, or
if it should be the responsibility of the individual pilots to call
this out to the CD (my preference) should probably be clarified. If
you can't climb you should make that clear before the gate opens so
the CD has the option of delaying/canceling the opening of the gate or
chalking it up to poor piloting. One such request was granted later in
the contest and I have made such requests myself in the past. I do
wonder whether pilots should forfeit their right to protest the start
later if they don't make the call in real time.


To avoid setting off anguished howls of "I can't climb, you gotta
delay opening the gate!", I don't radio the CD when faced with this
kind of problem. I have, however, called my class advisor on more than
one occasion and let him/her decide to call the CD with an official,
authorized communication. I recognize, of course, that my
request--"[task advisor ID], go to 123.5"--is tantamount to inviting
the world to listen in.

It's tough to judge from afar but it sounds like the task shouldn't
have opened. How to prevent situations like this in the future is
tougher, as is how to deal with them once they've occurred. I'm
strongly of the mind that once the task is open, it should not be
cancelled or invalidated. I don't want to have to judge whether to go
100% and risk a landout knowing the CD might change his/her mind, and
soaring is full of historical situations where nearly no one thought
the task possible but some intrepid pilot proved them wrong. But there
are valid exceptions to every rule in the interests of fairness and/or
safety. Defining those exceptions is difficult, which is why we value
the good CDs so highly. Rest in peace, Charlie Spratt; you made a few
mistakes but far fewer than anyone before or since, given the number
of contests you CD'd.

Finally, there shouldn't be any stigma associated with protesting what
a pilot believes is an unfair outcome. I'd hate to see competition
soaring turn into the US tort system but there is some merit in
raising the protest and having all the facts come out for an impartial
jury to review and decide. It is partly through this kind of exchange
that we will arrive at a better system in the future.

Although I still hope the Rules Committee keeps future Rules changes
to a bare minimum!

Chip Bearden
ASW 24 "JB"
USA
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Not fair. Maxwell[_2_] Piloting 34 June 30th 08 03:53 PM
What percentage of USA glider pilots compete? Jeremy Zawodny Soaring 30 April 4th 07 05:30 AM
Fair Share Mike Granby Owning 17 July 19th 05 06:23 AM
OT-Fair reporting? Joel Corwith Soaring 4 November 28th 04 05:54 PM
OT-Fair reporting? Joel Corwith Home Built 3 November 28th 04 04:12 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.