![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Whether it should be incumbent on the CD to poll the last launchers in
each class to ensure they are getting up before opening the gate, or if it should be the responsibility of the individual pilots to call this out to the CD (my preference) should probably be clarified. If you can't climb you should make that clear before the gate opens so the CD has the option of delaying/canceling the opening of the gate or chalking it up to poor piloting. One such request was granted later in the contest and I have made such requests myself in the past. I do wonder whether pilots should forfeit their right to protest the start later if they don't make the call in real time. To avoid setting off anguished howls of "I can't climb, you gotta delay opening the gate!", I don't radio the CD when faced with this kind of problem. I have, however, called my class advisor on more than one occasion and let him/her decide to call the CD with an official, authorized communication. I recognize, of course, that my request--"[task advisor ID], go to 123.5"--is tantamount to inviting the world to listen in. It's tough to judge from afar but it sounds like the task shouldn't have opened. How to prevent situations like this in the future is tougher, as is how to deal with them once they've occurred. I'm strongly of the mind that once the task is open, it should not be cancelled or invalidated. I don't want to have to judge whether to go 100% and risk a landout knowing the CD might change his/her mind, and soaring is full of historical situations where nearly no one thought the task possible but some intrepid pilot proved them wrong. But there are valid exceptions to every rule in the interests of fairness and/or safety. Defining those exceptions is difficult, which is why we value the good CDs so highly. Rest in peace, Charlie Spratt; you made a few mistakes but far fewer than anyone before or since, given the number of contests you CD'd. Finally, there shouldn't be any stigma associated with protesting what a pilot believes is an unfair outcome. I'd hate to see competition soaring turn into the US tort system but there is some merit in raising the protest and having all the facts come out for an impartial jury to review and decide. It is partly through this kind of exchange that we will arrive at a better system in the future. Although I still hope the Rules Committee keeps future Rules changes to a bare minimum! ![]() Chip Bearden ASW 24 "JB" USA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Not fair. | Maxwell[_2_] | Piloting | 34 | June 30th 08 03:53 PM |
What percentage of USA glider pilots compete? | Jeremy Zawodny | Soaring | 30 | April 4th 07 05:30 AM |
Fair Share | Mike Granby | Owning | 17 | July 19th 05 06:23 AM |
OT-Fair reporting? | Joel Corwith | Soaring | 4 | November 28th 04 05:54 PM |
OT-Fair reporting? | Joel Corwith | Home Built | 3 | November 28th 04 04:12 AM |