![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
bumper wrote:
"Eric Greenwell" wrote in message ... I don't recall ever seeing an estimate of the performance loss in a glider as a function of yaw string deflection. Does anyone know what it is? Ultimately, I'm wondering how much attention should be paid to deflections of, say, 1/8", 1/4", 1/2", etc., on the usual 4"-5" long yaw string. I suppose a professionally manufactured and tested yaw string, like the Mk IV, comes with a performance correction card (much like compass has), but I just have a blemished one I got an outlet store - no card. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric, I take this yaw string business seriously, though admittedly making MKIV's is a whole different thing than being able to fly with them straight. No card is provided with the MKIV, as we have no control over which side of the equator the MKIV is to be used. And, as I'm sure you are aware, coriolis effect can wreck havoc upon yaw strings if they are not properly degaussed. Without glider specific flight testing, we may still assume that in straight flight and with the yaw string straight back, we have unity or 100%. With the yaw string 90 degrees off to the side or anything forward of that, we have a problem, or for our purposes, 0%. By extrapolation . . . Ummm, what was the original question? bumper proudly churning out MKIV and QV's for the unwashed masses. I've just read on aviationblather.com the FAA is cooking up a new NPRM to require all MKIV yaw string installations to display a 2" square placard within 6" of the yaw string. The placard supposedly shows a yaw string at right angles to the canopy, with a red circle/slash over it. Not only would this raise the cost of the MKIV, but it would reduce the pilot's view of the sky and increase the chance of collisions. Another example of bureaucratic meddling! -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * Sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What angle creates MAXIMUM air deflection? | [email protected] | General Aviation | 6 | January 30th 07 01:38 AM |
Full deflection = missed approach ??? | pgbnh | Instrument Flight Rules | 33 | October 21st 05 01:57 PM |
"zero" versus "oscar" versus "sierra" | Ron Garret | Piloting | 30 | December 20th 04 08:49 AM |
US kill loss ratio versus Russian pilots in Korean War? | Rats | Military Aviation | 21 | January 26th 04 08:56 AM |
P-47/51 deflection shots into the belly of the German tanks,reality | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 131 | September 7th 03 09:02 PM |