![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 16, 12:08*pm, John Cochrane
wrote: from my example it looks like drop a day is a terrible idea and here it is why: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Day 1 * Day 2 * Day 3 * Day 4 * Day 5 * * * Total Pilot 1 * * * * 950 * * 950 * * 1000 * *1000 * *1000 * *4900 Pilot 2 * * * * 1000 * *1000 * *1000 * *955 * * 500 * * 4455 Pilot 1 is the winner. Clearly Pilot 1 deserves to win. Now if you introduce drop a day then Pilot 2 is the winner. Does Pilot 2 deserve to win? Absolutely NOT! There are lots of scenarios to think about here. Many of our top pilots have lost nationals to mediocre people like me by one unlucky landout. If Pilot 1 were BB, slow but steady, and Pilot 2 were DJ or P7, who got a lot of sink on final glide and landed 1/2 mile out despite a blistering speed, would you feel the same way? Would BB really deserve to go on to the worlds on this basis? (Not far from the truth, incidentally) *A lot of motivation for "drop a day" comes from people feeling that yes, in many practical situations like this, pilot 2 did deserve to win and was the best pilot. "Deserve" is pretty nebulous, and rules like this need to consider lots and lots of cases, and which kinds really do happen in practice. They also need to consider fun and incentives. If we're going to go on to "drop a day" we should start a different thread, separating it from Parowan and protests. I'd just as soon let it sit for a while personally John Cochrane BB All, Briefly, yes, rule tweaking can be over done but I'm all for trying something new now and then, especially if its already a useable rule. I recall the "Super Regional" concept stirred up a hornets nest of RAS comments but nary a peep of complaint or comment about it since it was applied at Parowan this year. Mainly because it was a non-event, generally if you wanted in, you got in. I suspect the drop/dump/toss/relinquish/ do over or gratefully dispose of a day concept may have substantially more impact but really, why not try it? Here's my point and the reason for keeping it in this thread; I'm fairly certain it would have addressed and legitimized the Parowan sports class day in question mentioned here. And this rule would have been likely welcomed by most of the 15m class on the last day when all but two failed to get around due to substantial widespread t-storms and rain dramatically affecting the late starters. So really other than producing a list of silly "what if" situations whats the harm in giving it a go, Ill attend that contest, we just need a CM/CD who's willing to give it a go. 21 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Not fair. | Maxwell[_2_] | Piloting | 34 | June 30th 08 03:53 PM |
What percentage of USA glider pilots compete? | Jeremy Zawodny | Soaring | 30 | April 4th 07 05:30 AM |
Fair Share | Mike Granby | Owning | 17 | July 19th 05 06:23 AM |
OT-Fair reporting? | Joel Corwith | Soaring | 4 | November 28th 04 05:54 PM |
OT-Fair reporting? | Joel Corwith | Home Built | 3 | November 28th 04 04:12 AM |