![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 7, 7:05*pm, ZZ wrote:
It is likely that the probability of an ACTUAL double release failure on tow is what ever positive number is closest to zero. Of course that doesn't mean that Mr.Murphy can't serve one of these up. I would be interested in hearing any accounts of actual, non-instructor induced double release failures which required either a landing on tow or purposely breaking he rope to end the problem. I would also be interested in any opinions regarding practicing landing on tow to prepare oneself for this unlikely event. (I know that this is or was a required maneuver in some European countries...but is it worth the risk?) Paul ZZ It's probably worth mentioning that 'release failure' can also be an uncommanded release. I've had a couple of those when the wing runner didn't fully insert the Tost ring set into the hook but it somehow partially engaged only to release on it's own later. Examination showed nothing wrong with the hook. I recall the story of a woman in a 1-26 who had the red ball come off in her hand due to the steel cable breaking off inside the ball. She looked at it for a moment, then reached under the panel and pulled on the remaining cable activating the release. Cool head. I've flown several training gliders which required an unusual amount of pulling motion to effect a release - the usual 2" tug wouldn't do it. Many pilots checking out in the glider would report a 'release failure' and I'd have to say "pull further". The take home is that you need to make sure you've fully actuated the release. Final note: The FAA and NTSB seem to be taking a serious look at release mechanisms, ring sets and weak links. If there's an accident investigation, it probably isn't wise to be found to be using a chain link in instead of a Tost ring set or a weak link at variance from that specified in the POH. I've been informed that the weak link, Tost hook and ring set are part of a gliders airworthiness certificate documentation and substitutions are judged to be an unauthorized modification from a regulatory and enforcement perspective. Most JAR 22 gliders specify a weak link strength + or - 10% (read your POH) for both aero tow and winch which effectively requires a metal link made by Tost or equivalent. Rope weak links can't meet that strength tolerance. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
You (Double-A) broke it, so you fix it. | Michael Baldwin, Bruce | Products | 0 | November 30th 06 05:01 AM |
Double (or more) posting | flying_monkey | Soaring | 1 | September 1st 06 03:54 PM |
Double tow | [email protected] | Soaring | 2 | October 25th 05 07:16 PM |
Double Tow | Doug LS4 | Soaring | 5 | October 11th 05 02:37 AM |
Rare V-2 Double Launch Pic, WW2 | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 0 | July 8th 03 05:02 PM |