![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
C Gattman wrote:
We can debate whether they should be called "runway incursions" or just "incursions" all day long, but, where the rubber meets the taxiway, which is at present about 75 feet behind where I'm sitting, if you enter the taxiway without clearance, the tower, which is about 100 yards to the west of me right now, will report it as a runway incursion and, according to them, the FAA will generally rule that it was caused by pilot deviation. That's quite simply how it works, right now, at the Class D towered airport where I am presently writing this, according to the chief pilot, the CFIs, CFIIs and ATPs who are here right now, the FSDO and the FAA-licensed controller of the FAA control tower with whom we just spoke. Something in the water out there? I'll contact FSDO dude and tower dudes tomorrow, I contacted Gene Benson today. Here is my message to him followed by his reply: Dear Mr. Benson, Your web page on Runway Incursions has been brought to my attention. I noted the following: "By the way, a runway incursion is simply driving an airplane to somewhere it is not supposed to be on a particular airport at that particular time. Runway incursions are not limited to controlled airports or to runways. If reported, an airplane taxiing onto a runway at an uncontrolled airport while another airplane is on final approach would be considered to be a runway incursion. Also, an airplane at a controlled airport that entered a taxiway onto which it had not been cleared would also be considered a runway incursion." That's not correct, runway incursions pretty much ARE limited to runways. Almost a year ago the definition of Runway Incursion in FAA Order 7050.1 was amended to be consistent with the ICAO definition: "Any occurrence at an aerodrome involving the incorrect presence of an aircraft, vehicle or person on the protected area of a surface designated for the landing and take-off of aircraft." The previous definition, which had been in use since 1987, was: "Any occurrence at an airport involving an aircraft, vehicle, person, or object on the ground that creates a collision hazard or results in a loss of separation with an aircraft taking off, intending to take off, landing, or intending to land." Unauthorized operation on a taxiway at a towered airport would be a Pilot Deviation, Vehicle Deviation, or a Pedestrian Deviation, depending on the culprit. Sincerely, Steven P McNicoll GRB ATCT http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/m.../ND/7050.1.pdf http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/m...N%207050.2.pdf His reply: Thanks for the correct info. My notes show that I got that information from a JFK controller who spoke at a designated examiner meeting in 2004. Anyway, the article was rather dated so I took it down. Regards, Gene |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ILS Runway 1, Visual approach runway 4 KMEI - Video | A Lieberma[_2_] | Owning | 0 | July 4th 09 06:13 PM |
Runway Red Lights to cut down on incursions. | Gig 601XL Builder[_2_] | Piloting | 23 | March 3rd 08 08:28 PM |
Runway incursions | James Robinson | Piloting | 6 | November 10th 07 06:29 PM |
Rwy incursions | Hankal | Piloting | 10 | November 16th 03 02:33 AM |
Talk about runway incursions... | Dave Russell | Piloting | 7 | August 13th 03 02:09 AM |