Runway incursions

On Sep 21, 6:14*pm, C Gattman wrote:

Awfer... are you saying I didn't quote sources? *Why, McNicoll
corrected one of them. How'd he do that if I offered "nothing
tangible"?

Only when Steve push you to put up or shut up did you offer anything.
When I provided my link at that time (READ this thread), you offered
me nothing. It's here in this thread if you don't believe me.

What I said was:

Because I'm an instructor and I brought it up on the student forum I feel obliged to "reciprocate" and clarify for other readers.

I don't see how you could interpret that as "I'm right because I am an
instructor." *My point was that as an instructor I feel obligated to
clarify in a case where I say something and somebody challenges it or
asks for clarification.

Which I did, I challenged you to give me a source of your information
OUTSIDE hearsay.. I asked you for a source you wouldn't produce WHEN
I ASKED. Your answer was

Because I'm an instructor and I brought it up on the student forum I
feel obliged to "reciprocate" and clarify for other readers.
Apparently, telling you what I saw happen has no value to you so
clearly you don't respect my word. I'm not out here to engage in some
sort of penis-measuring contest with a couple of usenet know-it-alls,
if that's what this is going to turn into.

Nothing taken out of context, word for word I copied and pasted your
response above. What kind of CRAP instructor are you? You want
respect GIVE RESPECT. I see nothing respectful out of your response
to me.

I didn't say I know it all, I responded back with a source supporting
what I thought was a definition of a runway incursion. You my friend
did not return that courtesy TO ME for which I asked from you. It's
all here in this thread.