A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Questions about diamond distance.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17  
Old October 9th 09, 01:21 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Papa3
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 444
Default Questions about diamond distance.

On Oct 8, 8:15*pm, Darryl Ramm wrote:
On Oct 8, 4:14*pm, Martin Gregorie
wrote:





On Wed, 07 Oct 2009 19:38:36 -0700, Papa3 wrote:


The geometry prevents you from having a very "flat" triangle where you
basically fly along the ridge and bounce out a few miles to make a
triangle with one very LOOONG leg and two other legs that are only half
as long. * SeeYou or other preflight planning software actually show you
how to lay out a triangle that meets these criteria.


IME it can be quite flat. By way of concrete example of a permissible
long, skinny triangle, I got Diamond Goal and Gold Distance on GRL-BSE-
EDG-GRL in 2004, which counts as an 18.9% triangle. GRL is the apex of
the triangle with BSE-EDG forming the base. Flatness: the base-apex
distance is 0.24 km. For those who don't fly in the UK, GRL is Gransden
Lodge, my home field, BSE is Bury St Edmunds and EDG is Edgehill. If
you're curious about the geometry, the whole story including maps, is
he


http://www.gregorie.org/gliding/300km/040625.html


Since this was acceptable in 2004, has the definition of an acceptable
triangle changed since?


--
martin@ * | Martin Gregorie
gregorie. | Essex, UK
org * * * |


Again read my earlier comment. FAI triangle geometry does NOT apply to
badges. This is not a recent change.

This thread needs to die.

Darryl- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


My humblest apologies to Darryl and any others I may have harmed with
my ill-guided attempt to help Scott out. I got carried away (having
some fun) with the descripton of the rules. Of course flat triangles
are not a problem for badges, only for records. Scott, I offer a
full refund on my consulting fees.

Of course, the real point of excerpting rules was to point out that -
yes- the rules actually DO answer all of these questions. You just
have to read them. Having said that, the interpretation is often not
straight forward, and it usually helps to draw pictures to illustrate
the concepts. In this regard, the companion documents to the base
rules (annex C in particular) are very useful. The documents are
available he

http://www.fai.org/gliding/sporting_code

Off for the final race of the year at Fairfield, so over-and-out on
this topic.

P3







Scott,
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cherokee goes the distance Tony Soaring 2 September 30th 06 04:58 PM
Diamond Distance flight plan 303SAM Soaring 6 April 4th 06 12:21 AM
Question, Diamond distance as unsuccessful triangle. Roger Aviation Marketplace 1 November 22nd 04 07:34 PM
Question, Diamond distance as unsuccessful triangle. Roger Soaring 1 May 13th 04 01:31 AM
Mig-29 questions & general aviation questions 2003 Steven Military Aviation 1 October 20th 03 06:06 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.