![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "a" wrote in message ... On Oct 18, 6:39 pm, "Peter Dohm" wrote: "a" wrote in message I was not trying to suggest that you failed to check the mags prior to takeoff, and I do not have an opinion as to whether an in-flight check would necessarily tell anything of value. The problem that I have personally observed was a case of points which had gradually "closed up" on a 65 horsepower Piper Cub until the engine could not be manually started--and then was started on the first "lave" pull after the points had been dressed and gapped. A second case, that was only confirmed much later, involved a Cessna 172 which occasionally required manual starting for an assortment of stupid reasons; but started very reluctantly in those instances... The salient point is that both aircraft passed all tests normally available to a pilot; but, based upon the number of hours that each was operated, probably had one or both mags out internal tolerances for multiple years. So there are failure modes that the pilot can not necessarily overcome--including damaged insulation on a p-lead, or a shorted mag switch, amoung others. By the way, what were the problems later identified on your aircraft? Peter My in-flight check in fact produced something of value, Peter. The engine in cruise went a little rough and stayed that way with mixture adjustments. When I went to a single bank of spark plugs the engine noise went from rough to none: I was flying on half the spark plugs. That told me two things -- to land for a repair, and what to tell the A&E. My suggestion in the OP was that pilots learn what their engine does when on a single bank of plugs when at cruise. It might be instructive, it might not be. The failure mode I experienced was in the high voltage lead between the magneto and the distributer. The voltage impulse found a gap more convenient than the one at the spark plugs, this on an engine that was only about 1100 hours (on a 2000 hour engine) since last major overhaul. I continued on my trip in less than 2 hours. Clearly the aviation gods smiled on me. It looks like you did about the only thing that can be done for that sort of problem. There is just no reasonable way, at least none that I have ever seen, to inspect for or predict an impending failure of a shielded cable--or of several other parts of magnetos and distributors. It just serves as the remaining justification for dual ignition! I'm glad that it worked out well. Peter |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Interesting and different flight on OLC | Dave Nadler | Soaring | 2 | August 4th 09 01:06 PM |
Solar Flight Much more interesting than Hilarious Video | Richard[_1_] | Soaring | 0 | December 5th 08 04:07 PM |
Interesting 2-plane takeoff at BWI 4-28-06 (formation flight) | Gary G | General Aviation | 2 | May 1st 06 08:42 PM |
An interesting trial flight attempt... | [email protected] | Soaring | 35 | February 12th 06 07:31 PM |
A small experiment | Mike Borgelt | Soaring | 16 | May 6th 05 06:41 AM |