![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 1, 1:41*pm, Udo wrote:
The 57 kt versus 50 kt can be explained by the fact, that the second glider was a little higher before it went through the same point in space as glider A. *Glider A had a wingloading of 8 lb/ft^2 Glider B 8.3 lb/ft^2. It was heavier by 3.6% Were they the same glider model? It's not clear what point you are trying to make or understand. Two gliders flying the same distance at different speeds will have different performance, particularly if they are not the same glider type and they fly even slightly different courses. The difference in starting speed between the two gliders doesn't matter. The only things that really matter in this example are the cruise speeds and the difference between starting energy and finishing energy - and of course the altitude loss over the prescribed distance. I'm dying to know the question behind your question. Is there a lesson in this for all of us? 9B |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Martin Van Bommel - Final Glide | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | March 19th 08 04:55 PM |
Final Glide - JD (US) | Roy Clark, B6 | Soaring | 1 | September 19th 07 07:17 AM |
final glide estimates | bagmaker | Soaring | 44 | March 16th 06 11:57 PM |
AC Williams -Final Glide | [email protected] | Soaring | 4 | January 23rd 06 04:52 AM |
Final Glide for Don Dorrell | JJ Sinclair | Soaring | 2 | December 2nd 03 02:56 PM |