![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Jim Logajan wrote: Alan Baker wrote: In article , Beryl wrote: Alan Baker wrote: It's like the downwash argument. You can say "IT DOESN'T MATTER", when people argue that the air behind an aircraft is not deflected downward, but it *does* matter. Having an accurate understanding of the physical processes of flight matters. It isn't really deflected downward, not for long anyway. It's churning in a torus. Like a smoke ring. No. It really *is* deflected downward. It's also deflected upward. ;-) Here's why: Because the airplane and the Earth have zero relative vertical velocity during straight and level flight, conservation of momentum requires the net vertical flow of air to also be zero. Therefore in subsonic flows where the fluid is assumed incompressible, to the extent any fluid is moving downward, conservation of mass requires an equal amount of mass must be moving upward (the continuity requirement.) Hence airplanes must cause air to move in circles. Nope. Wrong. The aircraft is experience an force upward the entire time it is in flight. That force means there must be an equal force acting on the air, and since the air was not moving vertically (in our idealized case for this discussion) before the aircraft arrived, the force exerted on it must mean that it is moving downward afterward it has passed. The edges of the deflected area churn, and the air that is deflected ends up getting diffused among all the other air below *it*, but it really is deflected downward. Yes some deflection downward occurs. But I don't know that it could be said to "diffuse" in any sense due to conservation of mass and momentum requirements. As the air the plane has forced downward encounters more air, the momentum is diffused so that a greater and greater mass of air moves downward at smaller and smaller velocities (net)... ....until it encounters the ground. And eventually, that downward deflection makes it way until it -- very diffusely -- impacts upon the surface of the earth. That is the only thing that finally stops it. That assertion is not true in general. What appears to happen instead is that any downward deflection is quickly reversed, leading to what is known as a shed vortex. Here are some links on the subject: http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/shed.html Sorry, but the vortex is an edge effect. The net flow is downward. http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/downwash.html While the deflected flow doesn't need to reach the surface of the earth for the airplane to stay aloft, an increase in air _pressure_ would eventually make its way to the surface. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pressure Distribution Charts | sisu1a | Soaring | 0 | September 21st 08 05:53 PM |
Soundwaves Boost Wing Lift | [email protected] | Home Built | 30 | September 5th 05 10:21 PM |
747 weight distribution | Robin | General Aviation | 25 | June 22nd 05 03:53 AM |
Distribution of armor on a B-52 | B2431 | Military Aviation | 12 | August 16th 04 09:07 PM |
Alternator load distribution in a Baron | Viperdoc | Owning | 7 | December 9th 03 10:27 PM |