![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alan Baker wrote:
In article , Beryl wrote: ... You've seen pics of it curling right back up. http://www.efluids.com/efluids/gallery/gallery_pages/Morris_4.jsp It hasn't bounced off the ground. You've seen the edges curling back up. That photo shows ALL of the flow curling back up. The bottom of the vortex couldn't be any clearer, and there's nothing extending further down underneath it. Pressure waves can reach the ground, without the air in the column descending to the ground. I never said that the particular molecules that the aircraft touches are the ones that have to reach the ground. You said "The net flow is downward until it hits the ground and the momentum is transfer to the earth." The molecules that "reach" the ground are the ones that were *already there* at ground level. The fact is that if the aircraft and the Earth are to remain the same distance apart, the plane must "push" against the Earth with a force equal to the force of gravity. The air is the medium by which the aircraft can transmit that push. Right. And I can push against the hill across the road with my voice. Not much, but enough to move the diaphragm in a microphone over there, in a split second. The air expelled from lungs is never going to make it across the road. No, sorry. You don't push the hill with your voice. Of course I do. The pressure waves contain both positive and negative phases. So you think that a positive won't push because a negative will be coming along shortly? And to explain to you why your hypothetical craft with the radial exhaust of air from a centrifugal fan won't work. The air that enters downward gets turned to go sideways. That 90 degree turn can only be accomplished by the a push upward from the aircraft and thus the air must push down on the system with an equal but opposite force. But is that 90 degree turn *exactly* the same as a 180 degree turn that directs incoming air back in the opposite direction? No, so I'll just turn my squirrel cage upside down with 180 degree flow redirection, and get lift with no net downwash. No, you won't. No downwash, no lift. No go learn something. Let's learn here. From you. Is that 90 degree turn *exactly* the same as a 180 degree turn that directs incoming air back in the opposite direction? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pressure Distribution Charts | sisu1a | Soaring | 0 | September 21st 08 05:53 PM |
Soundwaves Boost Wing Lift | [email protected] | Home Built | 30 | September 5th 05 10:21 PM |
747 weight distribution | Robin | General Aviation | 25 | June 22nd 05 03:53 AM |
Distribution of armor on a B-52 | B2431 | Military Aviation | 12 | August 16th 04 09:07 PM |
Alternator load distribution in a Baron | Viperdoc | Owning | 7 | December 9th 03 10:27 PM |