![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alright, I'll be the heretic in the group:
I find that a well-set-up PDA is much better than most of the flight computers out there! Many of the panel-mounted computers use text and/or point-and-line graphics; which, while visible in sunlight, don't give you nearly as good of an idea where you are as a moving map does. Maybe its because I'm younger than the average US glider pilot (sorry, not my fault) and I've grown up around computers and graphics, but I find moving-map symbology (with a couple of choice text items) MUCH easier to interpret at a glance, compared to the "screen full of text" approach of many glide computers. And some brain studies have proven that simple colors and shapes can be interpreted faster than text (letters are shapes as well; but shapes that need to get shuffled off to the linguistic part of the brain, IIRC). I think one of the problems is that most people pull a PDA out of the box, load up a flight program like XCSoar (my favorite) or SeeYou, and immediately compare it to the panel-mounted flight computers in top gliders. The issue is that the major PDA systems are far more customizable. IF people would take the time to tweak the PDA-based programs to display the information they want and in the style that they like, I think the overall opinion of these solutions would go up quite a bit! I also find the menu system and feature navigation in most panel- mounted flight computers is a NIGHTMARE. As a programmer with a lot of experience in webpages and other user-interfaces, these systems drive me up a WALL! The designers obviously didn't put a whole lot of thought into the fact that people will be fiddling with these things while _flying_. Since the flying is the more important part, some focus should have been put on easy navigation to the most important items in an unambiguous manner. IMHO, its a bad design to have 1 button perform 4 or 5 functions depending on how you hold it down or in what sequence you press it! They're getting better with the most recent generations of panel- mounted computers, but a lot of the older/used units on the market worry me... They require the most "heads-down" time to use, but are the cheapest and therefore the most likely items to be used by the least experienced pilots.... Seems like a BAD combo, to me! OK, enough ranting/opinionating... The bottom line is that neither PDAs nor Panel-mounted solutions are a silver-bullet. Anyone with interest in them should SPEND SOME TIME fiddling with a variety of solutions to find out what feels best to them - even if its just on the ground with some buddies' gliders. Be sure to ask about how each system can be customized - in case your idea of the perfect setup differs from your buddies! You want to make apples-to-apples comparisons, afterall. --Noel |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cheap Glide Computer | Uncle Fuzzy | Soaring | 18 | November 9th 09 09:24 PM |
New LK8000 glide computer video | PCool | Soaring | 6 | October 12th 09 06:19 PM |
iPhone Glide Computer | Kloudy via AviationKB.com | Soaring | 13 | September 13th 07 03:41 AM |
Glide computer | Mark Siegelberg | Soaring | 1 | January 13th 07 01:08 PM |
Best Glide computer and why | Roger | Soaring | 10 | October 24th 06 08:28 PM |