The NW overflight, what REALLY happened

On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 20:02:58 GMT, Mark wrote:

On 22 Dec 2009 17:38:20 -0000, Tsu Dho Nym wrote:

Mark wrote:

On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:05:27 +0800, Mike Ash wrote:

In article ,
Mxsmanic wrote:

A nice story, but these pilots still need to find a new line
of work. If any one of a great many possible factors had been
different, those pilots and everyone on board their aircraft
would be dead. Sorry, but they don't deserve any slack at
all. It's time for a change of career--something in which
flipping to the wrong frequency or chatting over laptops for
an hour won't put lives at risk.

Please elaborate. Offhand, I can't think of any change which
would have killed people here. Resulted in an emergency landing
somewhere other than their intended destination, perhaps, but
no deaths. According to this story, the pilots were awake and
aware, and would have eventually started wondering where they
were and why ATC hadn't talked to them yet. They would have
been able to quickly figure out their actual location, and
start talking to the appropriate people once they did. They
would have then been directed to an airport in that area that
could handle their plane. A worse outcome, certainly, but I
don't see any risk to life here.

Mike, you're responding to the Mx-Bloss troll,
it makes you look like an ass. Stop.

Nice try, forger.

Trying to get Mark into a spin?

**** off.

Nothing here for me either.
Further posts bearing my name are Jeffrey Bloss forgeries.
He's also Gieselle.
And a loser for life.
==
Mark


He is a lost loser. Neat and tidy