![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 5, 8:51*am, "Ken Kochanski (KK)"
wrote: Morning, I'm reviewing some STF topics to correct some fallacies that seem to have crept into my understanding of STF theory and application ... I though I knew this stuff ... or maybe I forgot ... I am a senior now, you know ... :-)) So, if I have MC set at 3 ... and I am crusing XC to the next three knotter ... should I slow in lift and speed up in sink ... *or will I have a faster average speed if I just hold speed steady ... i.e. at the velocity appropriate for MC = 3 in still air. I see pilots doing both ... Also, do all flight computers compute inter-thermal STF with the formula that does not include a wind component - as identified in Reichmann's texts, for example. Anybody have an excel program that will plot polars ... including the tangent to the shifted origin you get when *when you change airmass sink ... or tail/head winds .. Gracias, Happy new Year ... KK Heretic alert... :-) My suggestion: understand the theoretical points that Reichmann makes, then throw that damned book away. But excel spreadsheets are fun to play with on the laptop in front of the wood stove in January, so don't let me dissuade you there. My semi-obvious observations, shared with many others: 1. Achieved XC speed vs cruise speed for all of these speed to fly models goes through a very broad optimum. 2. The models all ignore transient losses -- your glider is optimized for 1.0 gee flight 3. Slower than "optimum" cruise speed enhances range, gives better chance of finding really good thermal for next climb, often results in higher XC speed. 4. The vario only tells you about where you've been. Better approach -- my $0.02 -- choose your speed based on what you anticipate encountering in the next 60 seconds. Fly smooth (IIRC, you already do). I think of it as STF theory with the sharp edges polished off. So what if you are "wrong" a lot of the time. See how you do next to the guy that is chasing needles. And it's more enjoyable flying this way, too. Basically, I'm providing justification here for the way a lot of us already fly, consciously or not. Arrrrgh. January sucks. But happy new year just the same. -Evan Ludeman / T8 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Inter-thermal cruise speeds? | Frank[_1_] | Soaring | 25 | February 25th 08 12:55 AM |
ENvironmentally Friendly Inter City Aircraft powered by Fuel Cells | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 83 | June 11th 07 11:07 PM |
Thermal Data Files Thermal Mapping Project Australia | Mal | Soaring | 0 | December 2nd 05 11:14 PM |
Inter Club Competition (US NE Node) | Ken Kochanski (KK) | Soaring | 1 | January 22nd 05 05:46 PM |
Inter Club Competition (US NE Node) | Ken Kochanski (KK) | Soaring | 0 | January 22nd 05 04:09 PM |